Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 4, 2026

Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
Published on: June 10, 2025
Predictive accuracy of phase angle for short-term and stage-specific mortality in cancer
Amanda S Rebouças1, Jarson P Costa-Pereira2, Rodrigo A B Ruegg3
1Postgraduate Program in Health Sciences, Health Sciences Center, Federal University of Rio Grande Do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande Do Norte, Brazil; Policlínica, Liga Contra o Câncer, Natal, Rio Grande Do Norte, Brazil.
Background And Aims:
Cancer-related factors can negatively affect nutritional status and impact disease trajectory. Prognostic biomarkers such as bioelectrical impedance-derived phase angle (PhA) may help identify patients at higher risk of adverse outcomes. This study aimed to determine optimal PhA cut-off points associated with short-term mortality across different cancer stages.
Methods:
This multicenter cohort included 1121 adult patients with cancer in Brazil (≥18 y; 51.2% females; mean age 60 ± 13 y; 43.6% colorectal cancer; 34.3% tumor, node, metastasis [TNM] IV). PhA was derived from raw bioelectrical impedance values: resistance (R) and reactance (Xc) from a tetrapolar single-frequency device (50 kHz). The primary outcome was 6-mo mortality. PhA's predictive accuracy was estimated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and cut-off points were estimated using the Youden index. Cox regression models examined crude and adjusted associations between PhA and mortality across TNM stages (I-IV).
Results:
PhA values were significantly lower in non-survivors (mean difference: -1.02° in males; -1.21° in females). ROC analyses demonstrated fair predictive performance, with optimal thresholds of ≤ 5.43° for males (AUROC 0.74) and ≤ 4.22° for females (AUROC 0.77). Across TNM stages, PhA consistently predicted mortality, with highest accuracy in stage IV (AUROC 0.75; criterion ≤ 4.72°). In multivariate Cox models, PhA remained independently associated with 6-mo mortality after adjustment for confounders. Stepwise analyses confirmed these findings across all stages.
Conclusion:
PhA is an independent predictor of short-term mortality in cancer across all TNM stages. Identified thresholds (consistently < 5.5°) may guide risk stratification and support clinical decision-making, although external validation is required.
More Related Videos
04:05Author Spotlight: Unveiling Prognostic Indicators in Heart Failure - The Role of Phase Angle and Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis
Published on: June 30, 2023
06:46Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Actuarial Approach
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
Kaplan-Meier Approach
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Assumptions of Survival Analysis
Introduction To Survival Analysis
The primary goal of survival analysis is to estimate survival time—the time...