Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 5, 2026

Single Incision Plus One Port Laparoscopic Proximal Gastrectomy with Double Channel Anastomosis for Gastric Cancer Treatment
Published on: December 27, 2024
Complications Post Gastrostomy Insertion in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer: A Systematic Review
A C Rogers1, C L Blake2, R Willims2
1Nutrition and Food Services, Ipswich Hospital, QLD, Australia.
Gastrostomy insertion, including percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) and radiologically inserted gastrostomy (RIG), is safe for head and neck cancer patients. Complication rates are minimal and similar between PEG and RIG procedures.
Area of Science:
- Gastroenterology
- Oncology
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Gastrostomy tube placement is common in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients for nutritional support.
- Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) and radiologically inserted gastrostomy (RIG) are primary methods for gastrostomy insertion.
- Both PEG and RIG procedures carry potential risks of adverse events.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct an updated systematic literature review of complications associated with gastrostomy placement in HNC patients.
- To compare the safety profiles of PEG versus RIG in the HNC population.
Main Methods:
- Systematic literature search of PubMed, CINAHL, and EMBASE databases (2008-2025).
- Inclusion of empirical studies reporting gastrostomy complications in adult HNC patients.
- Classification of complications as severe or mild adverse events, with assessment of risk of bias and certainty of evidence.
Main Results:
- Analysis of 25 studies involving 4854 gastrostomy procedures (3670 PEG, 1184 RIG).
- Median procedure-related mortality and severe complications were less than 1% for both PEG and RIG.
- Severe complications requiring intervention or hospitalization occurred in approximately 1% of cases for both methods, with severe infections being less than 1% for PEG and 1% for RIG.
Conclusions:
- Gastrostomy insertion via PEG or RIG is a safe procedure for HNC patients.
- There are minimal differences in complication rates between PEG and RIG.
- The choice of insertion technique should be guided by clinical indication, healthcare provider expertise, and available hospital resources.
Related Concept Videos
Enteral Nutrition II: Nasointestinal and Gastrostomy Feeding
Nasointestinal Feeding
Nasointestinal feeding involves placing a tube...
Enteral Nutrition I: Orogastric and Nasogastric Feeding
Orogastric (OG) and nasogastric (NG) feeding are two standard methods used for enteral nutrition. Enteral nutrition is often preferred over...
Peptic Ulcer Disease V: Surgical Management and Nursing Care
Surgical Interventions for Peptic Ulcer Disease
Aneurysm IV: Nursing Management
Esophageal Strictures-I: Introduction
Etiology
The primary cause of esophageal strictures is long-standing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), accounting for about 70 to 80% of adult cases. Chronic acid reflux can lead to injury and scarring of the esophageal lining, culminating in...
Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
Clinical Manifestations: