Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 6, 2026

Vessel-sparing Excision and Primary Anastomosis
Published on: January 7, 2019
Which benign-appearing impassable sigmoid strictures are safe to manage conservatively? Insights from a multicenter
Mohit S Gupta1, Ana D Gavrila2, Ismail Mallick1
1Department of Colorectal Surgery, University Hospitals Dorset, UK.
Background:
Impassable sigmoid strictures with benign endoscopic appearance present a clinical dilemma, balancing the risk of missed malignancy against the morbidity of surgical resection. Historical guidelines have recommended resection by default, but contemporary imaging and multidisciplinary team (MDT) input may allow for more selective, conservative management.
Objective:
To evaluate clinical features and decision-making factors associated with safe non-operative management of benign-appearing impassable sigmoid strictures.
Methods:
A multicentre retrospective analysis was conducted across three NHS hospitals between 2017 and 2023. Patients with benign-appearing sigmoid strictures at index colonoscopy were included. Data were collected on imaging, biopsy, MDT decisions, management strategy, and long-term outcomes. Patients were stratified by operative vs conservative treatment, and a decision-support framework was developed based on MDT experience.
Results:
Of 108 impassable sigmoid strictures, 51 were benign-appearing. Among these, 37 (72.5%) were managed conservatively and 14 (27.5%) underwent surgery. No cases of colorectal cancer were identified in the conservatively managed group over a minimum follow-up of two years. Malignancy was confirmed in 3 of 14 (21.4%) resected patients. Conservative decisions were supported by reassuring imaging, absence of red-flag symptoms, and benign or unobtainable biopsies. A practical framework was developed to guide MDT case selection.
Conclusion:
Selected patients with benign-appearing impassable sigmoid strictures can be safely managed without surgery, particularly when supported by modern imaging, clinical judgment, and MDT review. These findings challenge the need for routine resection and support a tailored, risk-adapted approach.
More Related Videos
08:26Clinical Application of Single-Surgeon, Three-Port, Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction
Published on: March 24, 2023
04:09The Pocket-Creation Procedure of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Large Rectal Laterally Spreading Tumors
Published on: February 13, 2026
Related Concept Videos
Esophageal Strictures-II: Clinical Features and Management
Healthcare providers should gather a comprehensive medical history and conduct a physical examination for diagnosis. If esophageal stricture is...
Esophageal Strictures-I: Introduction
Etiology
The primary cause of esophageal strictures is long-standing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), accounting for about 70 to 80% of adult cases. Chronic acid reflux can lead to injury and scarring of the esophageal lining, culminating in...
Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management
Here are some common surgical interventions for IBD:
Barrett Esophagus-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
To diagnose Barrett's esophagus, healthcare providers often recommend an endoscopy for those showing symptoms of acid reflux. The procedure...
Esophageal Varices-II: Clinical Features and Management
In the initial assessment, a thorough review of the patient's medical history is vital to identify risk factors such as liver disease, alcohol...
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...