Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 7, 2026

Decomposing the Variance in Reading Comprehension to Reveal the Unique and Common Effects of Language and Decoding
Published on: October 11, 2018
Who gets it? Explaining variability in children's written irony comprehension
Henri Olkoniemi1,2, Tuomo Häikiö2, Matti Laine3
1Unit of Psychology, University of Oulu, Finland.
None:
Understanding verbal irony involves detecting that the speaker's intended meaning contrasts with the literal meaning. This is challenging for children as the underlying skills required to understand irony may not be fully developed. We investigated how 10-year-olds' working memory, empathy skills, and gender were related to their processing and comprehension of written irony. Data from two previous eye-tracking experiments with 97 children (46 girls and 51 boys) were analysed. Results showed that children with stronger empathy skills had higher irony comprehension accuracy and were less likely to reread ironic phrases. Higher working memory was linked to faster processing of irony but did not lead to higher comprehension. Conversely, lower working memory was associated with more accurate irony comprehension. Child gender was not related to irony comprehension. These results imply that working memory and emotional perspective-taking are important for children's irony comprehension, underscoring theories that take individual differences into account.
Related Concept Videos
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory
Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory
Revisionist Views of Adolescent and Adult Cognition
Fundamental Attribution Error
Binet's Contribution to Measures of Intelligence
Hindsight Biases

