Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 7, 2026

Improving IV Insulin Administration in a Community Hospital
Published on: June 11, 2012
Advanced automated insulin delivery in inpatients receiving nutritional support: a single-center, open-label,
Yunying Cai1, Le Ma2, Linting Xun3
1The Endocrinology Department, First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, The Affiliated Hospital of Kunming University of Science and Technology, Type 1 Diabetes Alliance of Yunnan Province, Kunming 650032, China.
Aims:
This study addressed the challenge of glucose management in inpatients receiving nutritional support, even with automated insulin delivery (AID). We evaluated whether advanced AID would improve glycaemic control compared with standard subcutaneous insulin therapy in inpatients receiving nutrition support.
Methods:
We did a single-centre, open-label, randomised controlled trial in adult inpatients receiving nutrition support who required subcutaneous insulin therapy. Patients recruited from non-critical care surgical and medical wards were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive advanced AID or conventional subcutaneous insulin therapy (control group) given in accordance with local clinical practice. Patients were followed up for up to 20 days or until hospital discharge. The primary endpoint was the TIR, the proportion of time that sensor glucose concentrations were within the target range, 3.9-10.0 mmol/l. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number ChiCTR2300078746.
Results:
Between February 2023 and September 2024, 32 patients were assessed for eligibility; of these, 26 were enrolled and randomly assigned to the closed-loop group (n = 13) or the control group (n = 13). TIR was 63.1 % [SD 12.8] in the closed-loop group and 31.5 % [20.1]in the control group (difference 31.7 percentage points [95 % CI 18.0-45.2; P < 0.001]). The time spent below the target range (< 3.9 mmol/l) did not differ between groups. No serious adverse event occurred in each group. No episodes of severe hypoglycaemia or hyperglycaemia with ketonaemia occurred in either study group.
Conclusions:
The advanced AID system improves glycaemic control without increasing the risk of hypoglycaemia in inpatients receiving nutrition support, particularly in patients with acute severe pancreatitis.
Related Concept Videos
Insulin: Dosing Regimen and Adverse Effects
The basal dose constitutes about 40%-50% of the total daily dose, with the rest as premeal insulin. The mealtime insulin dose should mirror...
Enteral Nutrition II: Nasointestinal and Gastrostomy Feeding
Nasointestinal Feeding
Nasointestinal feeding involves placing a tube...
Insulin Formulations: Types and Delivery
Short-acting insulins are divided into...
Parentral Nutrition: Centeral and Peripheral Parental Nutrition
PN can be administered through two primary routes:
1. Central Parenteral Nutrition (CPN):
CPN involves delivering a high concentration of nutrients through a large vein. This is typically achieved using a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) or,...
Enteral Nutrition I: Orogastric and Nasogastric Feeding
Orogastric (OG) and nasogastric (NG) feeding are two standard methods used for enteral nutrition. Enteral nutrition is often preferred over...
Parenteral Drug Delivery Systems: Injectables, Implants, and Infusion Devices

