Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Mesenchymal Tissue-Driven Gene Programs Identify EMP3 as a Key Biomarker of Aggressiveness in Undifferentiated Sarcomas.

International journal of molecular sciences·2026
Same author

Clinical Characteristics of Complex Karyotype Soft Tissue Sarcomas: A Single-Institution Cohort Study.

Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)·2026
Same author

Deep Learning Model for Differentiating Between Neoplastic Pathologic Fracture and Nonpathologic Fracture Using Hip Radiographs.

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume·2025
Same author

Mechanisms and protective factors of pulmonary cement embolism associated with percutaneous cementoplasty for bone metastasis in the pelvis: A retro-prospective study.

Skeletal radiology·2025
Same author

CD47 in Osteosarcoma: Correlation with Metastasis and Macrophage-Mediated Phagocytosis.

Cells·2024
Same author

Sarcoma Immunotherapy: Confronting Present Hurdles and Unveiling Upcoming Opportunities.

Molecules and cells·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 7, 2026

Bioelectric Analyses of an Osseointegrated Intelligent Implant Design System for Amputees
14:31

Bioelectric Analyses of an Osseointegrated Intelligent Implant Design System for Amputees

Published on: July 15, 2009

14.6K

Can the Finite Element Method Be Applied to Patient-Specific Implant Evaluation?

Suyeon Lee1, Hyenmin Park2, Hyun Guy Kang1,3

  • 1Medical Engineering Branch, Division of Technology Convergence, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.

Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery
|April 6, 2026
PubMed
Summary

Finite element analysis (FEA) can now evaluate custom 3D-printed orthopedic implant fixation. This FEA approach accurately predicts screw fixation failure, enhancing surgical planning and success rates for complex bone defects.

Keywords:
Bone reconstructionFinite element analysisImplantOrthopedicsThree-dimensional printing

More Related Videos

Intravital Longitudinal Imaging of Vascular Dynamics in the Calvarial Bone Marrow
10:49

Intravital Longitudinal Imaging of Vascular Dynamics in the Calvarial Bone Marrow

Published on: April 11, 2025

1.3K
A Finite Element Approach for Locating the Center of Resistance of Maxillary Teeth
10:50

A Finite Element Approach for Locating the Center of Resistance of Maxillary Teeth

Published on: April 8, 2020

10.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 7, 2026

Bioelectric Analyses of an Osseointegrated Intelligent Implant Design System for Amputees
14:31

Bioelectric Analyses of an Osseointegrated Intelligent Implant Design System for Amputees

Published on: July 15, 2009

14.6K
Intravital Longitudinal Imaging of Vascular Dynamics in the Calvarial Bone Marrow
10:49

Intravital Longitudinal Imaging of Vascular Dynamics in the Calvarial Bone Marrow

Published on: April 11, 2025

1.3K
A Finite Element Approach for Locating the Center of Resistance of Maxillary Teeth
10:50

A Finite Element Approach for Locating the Center of Resistance of Maxillary Teeth

Published on: April 8, 2020

10.3K

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Computational Mechanics

Background:

  • 3D printing enables patient-specific implants for complex bone defects in orthopedic surgery.
  • Ensuring reliable fixation of these custom implants remains a significant clinical challenge.
  • Finite element analysis (FEA) offers a computational approach to evaluate implant stability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate an FEA-based workflow for assessing orthopedic implant fixation.
  • To optimize implant design and fixation strategies across different osteointegration stages.
  • To predict potential screw-fixation failure modes and timing.

Main Methods:

  • An FEA-based flow was developed to evaluate implant fixation.
  • The workflow was applied to the pelvic region, analyzing fixation at acute, pre-, and post-osteointegration stages.
  • Screw fixation methods (short vs. long screws) and their impact on outcomes were analyzed and validated with patient data.

Main Results:

  • FEA predictions closely matched clinical observations regarding screw-fixation failure.
  • The analysis identified specific locations and timings of potential fixation failures.
  • The study validated the FEA approach using data from two patient cases.

Conclusions:

  • FEA is a valuable tool for verifying orthopedic implant designs and fixation strategies.
  • This computational method can enhance preoperative planning for improved surgical success.
  • The developed FEA flow aids in addressing fixation challenges with 3D-printed orthopedic implants.