Which Technique is the Optimal Option for the Treatment of Displaced Far-Lateral (Cho Type IIC) Distal Clavicle
Chul-Hyun Cho1, Eun-Seok Son1, Chang-Jin Yon1
1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
Background:
As achieving stable fixation in unstable far-lateral distal clavicle fractures is challenging, the optimal surgical treatment remains controversial. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological results of coracoclavicular fixation (CCF) versus anatomical locking plate fixation (ALPF) in patients with Cho type IIC fractures.
Methods:
Thirty-eight patients who underwent surgical treatment for Cho type IIC fracture were included. Open CCF using a suture button device was performed in 25 patients and ALPF was performed in 13 patients. The mean follow-up period was 35.7 months (range, 12-132 months). Radiographic results were evaluated using serial plain radiographs. Clinical results were evaluated using the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) score, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, and Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV).
Results:
No significant differences were observed between the CCF and ALPF groups in terms of UCLA score (32.0 vs. 32.1), ASES score (90.6 vs. 91.0), and SSV (90.6% vs. 89.6%). Although significant differences between the 2 groups were observed in the mean coracoclavicular (CC) distance of the affected side at the immediate postoperative period (5.2 mm vs. 9.0 mm) and final follow-up (5.7 mm vs. 9.1 mm), the CC distances between the immediate postoperative period and final follow-up in each group were maintained without significant loss of reduction. In the CCF group, complications occurred in 4 of 25 cases (16.0%) including skin irritation caused by a superior button or knot in 2 cases, nonunion in 1 case, and shoulder stiffness in 1 case. In the ALPF group, complications occurred in 2 of 13 cases (15.4%) including screw pull-out in 1 case and shoulder stiffness in 1 case.
Conclusions:
Both CCF using a suture button device and ALPF without CC augmentation for type IIC fractures showed satisfactory clinical and radiological results. Both techniques can be recommended as the optimal option that can provide sufficient vertical stability for solid union.
More Related Videos
04:41Treatment with Locking Intramedullary Nailing for Intertrochanteric Fracture of the Femur Utilizing a New Awl with a Distal Positioner
Published on: June 6, 2025
04:19Minimally Invasive Treatment for Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture Using Sagittal Alignment Screws and A Trauma Reduction Device
Published on: November 8, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Fractures: Bone Repair
Minor fractures with no bone displacement are treated by immobilizing the fractured bone using a cast or splint. However, in the case of fractures with displaced bones, the broken bones are repositioned before immobilization to ensure successful healing without deformation and loss of function. The realignment of fractured bone ends is performed through a process called reduction. If the...
Flail Chest-II
Assessment:
1. Clinical Evaluation:
History:
