Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Epigenetic Regulation01:37

Epigenetic Regulation

4.2K
Epigenetic changes alter the physical structure of the DNA without changing the genetic sequence and often regulate whether genes are turned on or off. This regulation ensures that each cell produces only proteins necessary for its function. For example, proteins that promote bone growth are not produced in muscle cells. Epigenetic mechanisms play an essential role in healthy development. Conversely, precisely regulated epigenetic mechanisms are disrupted in diseases like cancer.
X-chromosome...
4.2K
Epigenetic Regulation01:46

Epigenetic Regulation

26.3K
26.3K
Epigenetic Regulation01:46

Epigenetic Regulation

34.3K
Epigenetic mechanisms play an essential role in healthy development. Conversely, precisely regulated epigenetic mechanisms are disrupted in diseases like cancer.
34.3K
Inheritance of Chromatin Structures03:17

Inheritance of Chromatin Structures

7.9K
Epigenetics is the study of inherited changes in a cell's phenotype without changing the DNA sequences. It provides a form of memory for the differential gene expression pattern to maintain cell lineage, position-effect variegation, dosage compensation, and maintenance of chromatin structures such as telomeres and centromeres. For example, the structure and location of the centromere on chromosomes are epigenetically inherited. Its functionality is not dictated or ensured by the underlying...
7.9K
Position-effect Variegation02:32

Position-effect Variegation

7.3K
In 1928, a German botanist Emil Heitz observed the moss nuclei with a DNA binding dye. He observed that while some chromatin regions decondense and spread out in the interphase nucleus, others do not. He termed them euchromatin and heterochromatin, respectively. He proposed that the heterochromatin regions reflect a functionally inactive state of the genome. It was later confirmed that heterochromatin is transcriptionally repressed, and euchromatin is transcriptionally active chromatin.
7.3K
Chromatin Position Affects Gene Expression02:35

Chromatin Position Affects Gene Expression

25.2K
Chromatin is the massive complex of DNA and proteins packaged inside the nucleus. The complexity of chromatin folding and how it is packaged inside the nucleus greatly influences  access to genetic information. Generally, the nucleus' periphery is considered transcriptionally repressive, while the cell's interior is considered a transcriptionally active area. 
Topologically Associated Domains (TADs)
The 3-dimensional positioning of chromatin in the nucleus influences the...
25.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Childhood internalising symptoms at ages 3 and 6: a meta-analysis of epigenome-wide associations from cord and peripheral blood.

Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines·2026
Same author

Disentangling direct and indirect genetic pathways to neurodevelopmental risk: brain structure and behavior in a population-based parent-offspring trio study.

Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines·2026
Same author

Direct and indirect genetic effects of birthweight predisposition on child DNA methylation at birth.

Epigenetics·2026
Same author

Retinal Microvasculature and Emotional, Behavioral, and Cognitive Outcomes at School Age.

Journal of the American Heart Association·2026
Same author

Brain Age in Conduct Disorder:: A Mega-Analysis of the ENIGMA Antisocial Behavior Working Group.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Lifecourse genome-wide association study meta-analysis refines the critical life stages for adiposity's influence on breast cancer risk.

Science advances·2026
Same journal

HOTAIR at the metabolic crossroads: lncRNA control of carbohydrate and lipid metabolism.

Epigenomics·2026
Same journal

Long-term molecular embedding of early life adversity: leukocyte DNA methylation and gene expression associations from childhood to young adulthood.

Epigenomics·2026
Same journal

Overview of transcriptomics and epigenomics approaches in the diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutics of primary brain cancers.

Epigenomics·2026
Same journal

Ultra-sensitive urine DNA methylation test enables early and accurate detection of bladder cancer.

Epigenomics·2026
Same journal

Promoter methylation-associated brain-enriched long noncoding RNAs in glioblastoma: a multi-cohort public epigenomic re-analysis.

Epigenomics·2026
Same journal

Clinical diagnostic utility of <i>MGMT</i> promoter methylation.

Epigenomics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 7, 2026

An Integrated Platform for Genome-wide Mapping of Chromatin States Using High-throughput ChIP-sequencing in Tumor Tissues
10:41

An Integrated Platform for Genome-wide Mapping of Chromatin States Using High-throughput ChIP-sequencing in Tumor Tissues

Published on: April 5, 2018

11.0K

Timing matters in population epigenomics.

Charlotte A M Cecil1, Janine F Felix2, Alexander Neumann1

  • 1Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Epigenomics
|April 6, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Most DNA methylation studies ignore age dynamics, risking obscured epigenetic timing effects. Time-aware research using longitudinal designs is crucial for accurate health outcome prediction and early risk detection.

Keywords:
DNA methylationdevelopmentepigenetic clocksepigenetic epidemiologyepigenetic timing effectsepigenome-wide association studies (EWAS)longitudinal cohort studiesmethylation profile scores

More Related Videos

Genome-wide Determination of Mammalian Replication Timing by DNA Content Measurement
08:06

Genome-wide Determination of Mammalian Replication Timing by DNA Content Measurement

Published on: January 19, 2017

8.9K
Measuring Single-Cell Aging with an Imaging-based Biomarker of Chromatin and Epigenetic Aging
09:10

Measuring Single-Cell Aging with an Imaging-based Biomarker of Chromatin and Epigenetic Aging

Published on: January 30, 2026

872

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 7, 2026

An Integrated Platform for Genome-wide Mapping of Chromatin States Using High-throughput ChIP-sequencing in Tumor Tissues
10:41

An Integrated Platform for Genome-wide Mapping of Chromatin States Using High-throughput ChIP-sequencing in Tumor Tissues

Published on: April 5, 2018

11.0K
Genome-wide Determination of Mammalian Replication Timing by DNA Content Measurement
08:06

Genome-wide Determination of Mammalian Replication Timing by DNA Content Measurement

Published on: January 19, 2017

8.9K
Measuring Single-Cell Aging with an Imaging-based Biomarker of Chromatin and Epigenetic Aging
09:10

Measuring Single-Cell Aging with an Imaging-based Biomarker of Chromatin and Epigenetic Aging

Published on: January 30, 2026

872

Area of Science:

  • Epigenetics
  • Genomics
  • Chronobiology

Background:

  • DNA methylation (DNAm) is dynamic throughout life.
  • Current research often analyzes DNAm at a single time point, controlling for age.
  • This static approach may obscure crucial age-dependent epigenetic timing effects.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To discuss the risks of ignoring age dynamics in DNA methylation research.
  • To synthesize evidence for epigenetic timing effects.
  • To provide recommendations for time-aware epigenetic studies.

Main Methods:

  • Literature synthesis on epigenetic timing effects.
  • Analysis of how temporal dynamics impact population epigenomics methods.
  • Formulation of recommendations for longitudinal epigenetic research.

Main Results:

  • Static analysis of DNA methylation risks obscuring age-dependent associations.
  • Temporal dynamics complicate standard epigenomic approaches like epigenetic clocks and meta-analyses.
  • Longitudinal designs and repeated DNAm profiling are essential.

Conclusions:

  • Moving from static to time-aware epigenetic research is necessary.
  • Awareness of epigenetic timing enhances DNAm tool potential for early risk detection, diagnosis, and monitoring.
  • Future research should prioritize longitudinal studies for a comprehensive understanding of DNA methylation dynamics.