Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 7, 2026

Single-Port Robotic-assisted Transaxillary Breast-conserving Surgery: A Prospective, Single-arm, Non-randomized Phase IIa Clinical Trial
Published on: August 19, 2025
The Cost of Matching into Plastic Surgery.
Myiah P Quach1, Emily E Zona, Malibongwe Murapa
1Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI.
Becoming a competitive plastic and reconstructive surgery (PRS) applicant is financially burdensome. The estimated cost ranges from $27,138 to $69,438, potentially limiting access to the field.
Area of Science:
- Medical Education
- Surgical Specialties
- Health Economics
Background:
- Integrated plastic and reconstructive surgery (PRS) is a highly competitive medical specialty.
- Applicants invest significantly in research, away rotations, and conferences to enhance their profiles.
- Previous research has assessed individual costs, but a comprehensive financial analysis is lacking.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct a comprehensive analysis of the financial toxicity associated with becoming a competitive PRS applicant.
- To estimate the cumulative costs of essential components for PRS residency applications.
Main Methods:
- A literature review was conducted to identify and quantify costs associated with away rotations, research fellowships, conference attendance, publication fees, residency applications, and interview travel.
- Cost estimations were calculated for applicants with and without a dedicated research year.
Main Results:
- Significant financial costs were identified, with estimations of $27,138 without a research year and $69,438 with a research year.
- Average applicants submit numerous applications, attend multiple interviews and conferences, and complete away rotations.
- These figures are likely underestimates due to unquantifiable variable costs.
Conclusions:
- The substantial financial investment required for PRS applications is unattainable for many, exacerbating existing disparities.
- High costs limit access to the field and necessitate external financial support.
- Structural reforms, such as subsidized travel and virtual interviews, are needed to improve accessibility.
More Related Videos
08:01Designing CAD/CAM Surgical Guides for Maxillary Reconstruction Using an In-house Approach
Published on: August 24, 2018
13:35Endoscopic Bilateral Nipple-sparing Mastectomy via a Single Axillary Incision with Immediate Pre-pectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction
Published on: May 17, 2024