Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 7, 2026

Immunoglobulin Gene Sequence Analysis In Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: From Patient Material To Sequence Interpretation
Published on: November 26, 2018
Comparative evaluation of two NGS-based assays for somatic hypermutation analysis of IGHV genes in chronic
Yehyun Kang1, Hyeonah Lee2, Yu Jin Park3
1Graduate School of Medical Science, Brain Korea 21 PLUS Project, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Purpose:
Somatic hypermutation (SHM) of the immunoglobulin heavy chain variable (IGHV) region is a key prognostic marker in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Traditionally, SHM status has been determined using Sanger sequencing (SS); however, next-generation sequencing (NGS) provides an alternative method for assessing both SHM status and clonal rearrangements. This study aimed to compare the performance of two commercially available NGS assays for evaluating IGH clonality and SHM status in CLL.
Methods:
In this retrospective study, 42 samples from patients diagnosed with CLL were analyzed. Genomic DNA extracted from peripheral blood or bone marrow aspirates was analyzed using two commercial NGS assays: the LymphoTrack® IGHV Leader (Leader) and IGH FR1 (FR1) assays (Invivoscribe, CA, USA). SS was performed as the reference method for SHM assessment.
Results:
The Leader assay identified clonality in 95.2% of cases, whereas the FR1 assay detected clonality in 88.1%. Conclusive SHM status was determined in 90.5% of samples using the Leader assay and in 76.2% using the FR1 assay; when results from both assays were combined, the rate increased to 92.9%. Among samples with conclusive results by both SS and each NGS assay, the Leader assay demonstrated higher concordance with SS (97.1%, 34/35) than the FR1 assay (86.2%, 25/29). Greater variability in clonal detection was observed with the FR1 assay.
Conclusion:
These findings indicate that the Leader assay provides a more reliable assessment of SHM status, with higher concordance with SS. Although the FR1 assay may offer additional information regarding clonal patterns, its results should be interpreted cautiously. Given the limited sample size, further studies are warranted to validate these findings. Overall, the Leader assay appears to be more suitable as a primary tool for SHM evaluation, with FR1 results serving a complementary role when interpreted in clinical context.
More Related Videos
15:07VDJ-Seq: Deep Sequencing Analysis of Rearranged Immunoglobulin Heavy Chain Gene to Reveal Clonal Evolution Patterns of B Cell Lymphoma
Published on: December 28, 2015
13:21Comprehensive DNA Methylation Analysis Using a Methyl-CpG-binding Domain Capture-based Method in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Patients
Published on: June 16, 2017