Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 8, 2026

Biosensor for Detection of Antibiotic Resistant Staphylococcus Bacteria
Published on: May 8, 2013
Mobile carbapenemases in Gram-negative bacilli: Modification of a simplified phenotypic method for routine laboratory
Ihorrana W Alflen1, Sheila A B Nishiyama1, Monica S F Mattos1
1State University of Maringá, Avenida Colombo 5790, 87.020-900 Maringá, Paraná, Brazil.
None:
Carbapenem resistance in Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) is a global health concern that requires accurate detection and effective treatment. Identification of isolates producing Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC), New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase (NDM) or both enzymes remain difficult, and inconclusive results may compromise treatment. This study proposes the modified Simplified Carbapenem Inactivation Method with Inhibitors (isCIM) to detect carbapenemase-producing GNB. To evaluate the performance of the isCIM a total of 56 carbapenemase-producing isolates were collected. All results from the new method were evaluated against the gold-standard molecular method, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), which was used to confirm the carbapenemase genes blaKPC and/or blaNDM. Phenotypic evaluations were performed using the Modified Carbapenem Inactivation Method with and without EDTA (eCIM and mCIM), the Simplified Carbapenem Inactivation Method (sCIM) and Combined Disk assay (CD). Cohen's kappa coefficient was performed to assess agreement between methods. For KPC and co-producers, methods without inhibitors (mCIM and sCIM) showed perfect agreement with PCR. For NDM, mCIM showed strong agreement (0.852) with PCR, whereas sCIM had almost perfect agreement (0.964). Among inhibitor-based methods, isCIM achieved perfect agreement for KPC and co-producers (1.000). For NDM-isolates, while CD reached perfect agreement with PCR, isCIM (0.890) and eCIM (0.860) had strong agreement. Regarding isolates co-producing carbapenemases, isCIM and CD results had better performance than eCIM. The results suggest that isCIM is highly effective to detect and differentiate carbapenemases, especially in co-producing isolates. The modified method is a useful and promising tool for routine use in clinical microbiology laboratories because it is easy to perform.
More Related Videos
08:58Isolation and Identification of Waterborne Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria and Molecular Characterization of their Antibiotic Resistance Genes
Published on: March 3, 2023
06:11Author Spotlight: Advancing Rapid Detection of Respiratory Pathogens Using Microfluidic Chip
Published on: March 29, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Inhibitors of Gram-positive Cell Wall Synthesis
Clinical Significance of Antibiotic Resistance
Mechanism of Antibiotic Resistance in MRSA
Methods of Classification and Identification
Automated Microbial Diagnostics
Development of Antibiotic Resistance