Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 8, 2026

Using a Classroom-Based Deese Roediger McDermott Paradigm to Assess the Effects of Imagery on False Memories
Published on: November 14, 2018
Comparing faded examples and cued reflection in teaching diagnostic reasoning
Francisco Carlos Specian Junior1, Silvia Mamede2,3, Lígia Maria Cayres Ribeiro2
1School of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Introduction:
Clinical reasoning is essential for patient safety but challenging to teach. Deliberate reflection (DR), which involves systematically contrasting diagnostic hypotheses during case practice, improves diagnostic performance, yet the optimal level of guidance remains unclear. Faded-examples progressively reduce guidance and may enhance future case performance. This study compared the effects of faded-examples and cued reflection on medical students' diagnostic accuracy.
Methods:
We conducted a two-arm experiment with sixth-year medical students. Students practiced DR using either faded-example or cued reflection. The study comprised a learning phase with six cases and a 15-day-later test phase with eight new cases, including studied and adjacent diseases. Outcomes included diagnostic accuracy, confidence, and recall of clinical information. We analyzed the data using a generalized mixed model with diagnostic accuracy as a dependent variable, group and disease type as fixed effects, confidence and recall as covariates, and participant as a random effect.
Results:
Seventy final-year medical students participated, and 59 completed both phases (51% women; mean age 24.8 years). No group differences were observed in diagnostic accuracy (p = .39) or confidence (p = .99) during learning. At test, diagnostic accuracy did not differ between instructional formats (p = .99), nor between studied and adjacent diseases (p = .32). Higher diagnostic accuracy was significantly associated with greater confidence (OR = 1.18, 95% CI [1.03, 1.35], p = .02) and with recall of a higher number of correct propositions (OR = 1.10, 95% CI [1.03, 1.17], p = .005). The contribution of recall to accuracy was weaker for adjacent than for studied diseases (OR = 0.74, 95% CI [0.12, 0.45], p < .001).
Conclusions:
Both approaches promoted reflective processing and yielded comparable accuracy, consistent with expertise-reversal effects. Higher accuracy was associated with greater recall and confidence. Future studies should examine earlier trainees and longer fading sequences to optimize transfer.
Related Concept Videos
Interference and Decay
Interference occurs when competing memories hinder the retrieval of particular information. It can be classified into two types: proactive and retroactive interference. Proactive...
Inductive Reasoning
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
Hindsight Biases
Reasoning
Inductive reasoning involves deriving generalizations from specific observations. This type of reasoning helps form beliefs about the world. For example,...
The Availability Heuristic
Deductive Reasoning
For example, a researcher can deduce specific predictions...

