Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 8, 2026

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
Published on: May 15, 2020
Identifying Research Priorities in Early Psychosis: A Collaborative Approach to Shaping the Future of Early Psychosis
Amity E Watson1,2, Stephen J Wood2,3,4, Ellie Brown1,2
1Orygen, the National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Introduction:
Psychotic disorders are major contributors to disability and mortality, disproportionately affecting young people. Despite advances in early psychosis care, there are still barriers to treatment, suboptimal outcomes, and limited therapeutic options. Given limited funding for psychosis research, priority setting that incorporates perspectives from across the sector, but especially those with lived experience, is vital for directing resources. This paper outlines the Australian Early Psychosis Collaborative Consortium's process for identifying priorities to guide early psychosis clinical trial research in Australia.
Methods:
Qualitative data were collected via online surveys and stakeholder workshops with people with lived experience, carers, clinicians and researchers. Content analysis was conducted, followed by iterative refinement and ranking of priority research questions across multiple stages.
Results:
Six broad themes and 55 research questions were identified through both the initial survey and stakeholder consultations, culminating in ten research questions for ranking in the final poll. The top-ranked priority was identifying treatments with the most enduring benefits for individuals with early psychosis. Other priorities included: identifying effective treatments for negative symptoms; addressing trauma in psychosis risk and treatment; focusing on supports for neurodevelopmental conditions; understanding and targeting risk factors to prevent psychosis onset; translation of research findings to clinical care; considerations of cultural diversity; and effective support for people leaving early psychosis services.
Conclusion:
These findings reaffirm the core objective of specialised early intervention for psychosis: to support long-term recovery and improved outcomes. Identified priorities offer direction for future research and resource allocation that reflects diverse stakeholder perspectives.
Related Concept Videos
Psychosis: Goals of Pharmacotherapy
Psychological and Sociocultural Causes of Schizophrenia
Clinical Trials: Overview
Treatment Strategies for Psychological Disorders
Psychological therapies focus on modifying emotions, thoughts, and behaviors through talking, interpreting, listening, rewarding, challenging, and modeling. Clinical psychologists, counselors, and social workers commonly practice psychotherapy. Clinical...
Theoretical Approaches to Psychological Disorder
Biological approach
The biological approach posits that internal, organic factors are the primary causes of such disorders. This perspective emphasizes brain structure and function, genetic predispositions, and neurotransmitter imbalances. For example, schizophrenia has been associated with both genetic...
Autism Spectrum Disorder
These core symptoms manifest differently among individuals, ranging from mild to severe. The disorder's complexity extends beyond its clinical presentation, encompassing a diverse range of biological, cognitive, and sociocultural influences.

