Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 8, 2026

Optical Coherence Tomography Based Biomechanical Fluid-Structure Interaction Analysis of Coronary Atherosclerosis Progression
Published on: January 15, 2022
From biology to imaging: Rethinking vulnerable plaques in coronary artery disease
Edoardo Elia1, Federico Carbone2,3, Marco Lombardi1
1Division of Cardiology, University Hospital SS Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, Alessandria, Italy.
Background:
Coronary artery disease continues to be a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide with atherosclerosis as its underlying cause. Initial pathological studies emphasized plaque rupture as the main trigger of acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Subsequent observations identified alternative substrates, such as plaque erosion and calcific nodules, while research has increasingly recognized atherosclerosis as a chronic, inflammatory and panvascular disorder.
Methods And Results:
This review critically examines current evidence on plaque vulnerability and destabilization, with a focus on intravascular imaging (IVI) findings. Optical coherence tomography, intravascular ultrasound and near-infrared spectroscopy have enabled detailed in vivo characterization of high-risk phenotypes, including thin-cap fibroatheromas, lipid-rich cores, macrophage infiltration, microcalcifications and intraplaque haemorrhage. These advances have improved pathophysiological understanding. However, the translation of imaging surrogates into prognostic tools remains uncertain. Although multiple studies have shown associations between imaging-derived vulnerability features and major cardiovascular events, lesion-specific prediction is inconsistent and preventive percutaneous treatment has not demonstrated clear benefit in terms of survival or myocardial infarction reduction. By contrast, intensive lipid-lowering and anti-inflammatory strategies have consistently promoted plaque stabilization and regression.
Conclusions:
Despite the insights offered by high-resolution IVI, vulnerable plaques should be considered as markers of global patient risk rather than reliable predictors of culprit lesions. Current evidence does not support routine pre-emptive intervention on non-culprit vulnerable plaques. Instead, optimized medical therapy remains the cornerstone of management. Future progress will depend on longitudinal studies integrating imaging, biology and clinical outcomes to bridge the gap between mechanistic understanding and therapeutic application.
More Related Videos
07:51Implantation of a Carotid Cuff for Triggering Shear-stress Induced Atherosclerosis in Mice
Published on: January 13, 2012
10:02Quantification of Atherosclerotic Plaque Activity and Vascular Inflammation using [18-F] Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography FDG-PET/CT
Published on: May 2, 2012
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease II: Pathophysiology
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction
Atherosclerosis I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations
Coronary Artery Disease III: Clinical Manifestations
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT