Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 9, 2026
Building Up a High-throughput Screening Platform to Assess the Heterogeneity of HER2 Gene Amplification in Breast Cancers
Published on: December 5, 2017
Prognostic Value of Ki-67 and Progesterone Receptor for Risk Stratification and Outcomes by Adjuvant Chemotherapy in
Hung-Hsun Chen1, Shu-Jyuan Chang2, Jung-Yu Kan1
1Division of Breast Oncology and Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Purpose:
Risk stratification of hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2-negative early breast cancer remains variable across studies. We aimed to develop and validate an immunohistochemistry (IHC)-based stratification framework (PR10/Ki20) and a quantitative risk score (RS), and to explore clinical outcomes according to receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy (CT).
Methods:
This retrospective study analyzed a discovery cohort (KMTTH, n = 2633) and an external validation cohort (KMUH, n = 1147). Using prespecified cutoffs, patients were categorized into four groups: low risk (LR; PR ≥ 10% and Ki-67 < 20%), moderate risk 1 (MR1; PR < 10% and Ki-67 < 20%), moderate risk 2 (MR2; PR ≥ 10% and Ki-67 ≥ 20%), and high risk (HiR; PR < 10% and Ki-67 ≥ 20%). A quantitative RS was derived incorporating PR10/Ki20 categories, age, pathological T stage, and lymphovascular invasion.
Results:
The PR10/Ki20 model demonstrated consistent prognostic performance across cohorts. HiR patients had significantly poorer disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), whereas the LR group exhibited favorable outcomes. In the validation cohort, adjuvant CT was associated with improved DFS in the HiR group, whereas no statistically significant association was observed in the LR group. The RS separated patients into high- and low-RS groups with significantly different DFS in both cohorts (KMTTH: P = 0.005; KMUH: P = 0.004).
Conclusion:
The PR10/Ki20 framework and the derived RS provide reproducible prognostic stratification in HR+/HER2- early breast cancer across two cohorts. In this retrospective analysis, CT use was associated with improved DFS among patients classified as high risk, while no statistically significant association was observed in the low-risk group. These findings may help inform risk-adapted discussions and generate hypotheses for prospective validation regarding treatment selection.