Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Rethinking the Booth: A Commentary on Implementing Boothless Audiometry for Hearing Conservation Programs.

American journal of audiology·2026
Same author

Personal attenuation rating as an indicator of audiometric threshold shifts.

International journal of audiology·2026
Same author

Functional Consequences of Tinnitus in Military Service Members.

American journal of audiology·2025
Same author

Estimated dose-response relationship between impulse noise exposure and temporary threshold shift in tactical training environments.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2025
Same author

Current Age and Language Use Impact Speech-in-Noise Differently for Monolingual and Bilingual Adults.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·2025
Same author

Transducer Variability in Speech-in-Noise Testing: Considerations Related to Stimulus Bandwidth.

American journal of audiology·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 9, 2026

An Automated System for Sound Localization Testing in Hearing-Impaired Listeners
07:56

An Automated System for Sound Localization Testing in Hearing-Impaired Listeners

Published on: March 13, 2026

115

Electroacoustic validation of a neck-based field attenuation estimation system.

Julianna R Voelker1,2, Devon Kulinski1,3, Douglas S Brungart1

  • 1Audiology and Speech Center, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland 20889, USA.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
|April 8, 2026
PubMed
Summary

A new neck-based hearing protector fit testing (HPFT) method shows consistent results for measuring personal attenuation rating (PAR) values. This approach offers a potentially universal solution for various hearing protection types.

More Related Videos

Objectively Assessing Sports Concussion Utilizing Visual Evoked Potentials
12:11

Objectively Assessing Sports Concussion Utilizing Visual Evoked Potentials

Published on: April 27, 2021

4.1K
A Method to Study Adaptation to Left-Right Reversed Audition
07:14

A Method to Study Adaptation to Left-Right Reversed Audition

Published on: October 29, 2018

7.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 9, 2026

An Automated System for Sound Localization Testing in Hearing-Impaired Listeners
07:56

An Automated System for Sound Localization Testing in Hearing-Impaired Listeners

Published on: March 13, 2026

115
Objectively Assessing Sports Concussion Utilizing Visual Evoked Potentials
12:11

Objectively Assessing Sports Concussion Utilizing Visual Evoked Potentials

Published on: April 27, 2021

4.1K
A Method to Study Adaptation to Left-Right Reversed Audition
07:14

A Method to Study Adaptation to Left-Right Reversed Audition

Published on: October 29, 2018

7.0K

Area of Science:

  • Audiology
  • Occupational Safety and Health
  • Acoustics

Background:

  • Current hearing protector fit testing (HPFT) systems often struggle with over-ear protection and double hearing protection.
  • Existing methods for measuring personal attenuation rating (PAR) may not be universally applicable.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the validity of a novel neck-based HPFT approach.
  • To assess the stability of the neck-to-ear transfer function for circumaural headphones.
  • To compare PAR values obtained with the neck-based method against conventional HPFT systems.

Main Methods:

  • Measured the neck-to-ear transfer function of headphones in various positions and across different head/ear geometries.
  • Utilized an acoustic test fixture to compare PAR measurements from a neck-based sound source with traditional HPFT methods.

Main Results:

  • The neck-based HPFT system demonstrated a stable neck-to-ear transfer function.
  • PAR values derived from the neck-based method were comparable to those from conventional HPFT systems.

Conclusions:

  • A neck-based HPFT approach is a valid method for measuring PAR.
  • This technique offers a promising, potentially universal solution for fit testing diverse hearing protection devices.