Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 10, 2026

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Role of Unfolded Protein Response in HIV-1 Replication and Infectivity
Published on: June 14, 2024
SARS-CoV-2 and MERS-CoV disrupt host protein synthesis via nsp1 with differential effects on the integrated stress
Nicholas A Parenti1,2, Renee Cusic3,4,5, David M Renner1,2
1Department of Microbiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
Abstract:
Coronaviruses pose a serious threat to public health, driving the need for antiviral therapeutics and vaccines. Therefore, it is paramount to understand how this family of viruses evades cellular antiviral responses and establishes productive infection. The conserved coronavirus nonstructural protein 1 (nsp1) has been shown to inhibit host protein synthesis and, in some coronaviruses, promote host messenger RNA (mRNA) degradation while viral mRNAs are protected. We showed previously that severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) induces activation of host integrated stress response (ISR) kinases protein kinase R (PKR) and PKR-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK), which promote phosphorylation of eukaryotic initiation factor 2 (eIF2α) and consequent inhibition of host protein synthesis. In contrast, eIF2α remains unphosphorylated during Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) infection. To investigate the interactions of nsp1 and the ISR kinases, we utilized recombinant SARS-CoV-2 and MERS-CoV expressing nsp1 with mutations in each of two conserved domains. Upon infection with SARS-CoV-2 nsp1 mutants, translation was shut down in wildtype (WT) and PKR knockout (KO) cells but rescued in PERK KO cells, likely due to reduced p-eIF2α. In contrast, translation was rescued during infection with the analogous MERS-CoV nsp1 mutants even in WT cells. Moreover, SARS-CoV-2 WT suppressed expression of GADD34, a negative regulator of eIF2α phosphorylation, while SARS-CoV-2 nsp1 mutants induced GADD34. In contrast, MERS-CoV WT induced GADD34. Utilizing single-molecule fluorescence in situ hybridization, we found that SARS-CoV-2 and MERS-CoV nsp1 promote host mRNA degradation during WT, but not nsp1 mutant, infection. Thus, SARS-CoV-2 and MERS-CoV differ in interactions with the ISR and nsp1 control of host protein synthesis.
Insights
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) nsp1 proteins differ in how they interact with the host integrated stress response (ISR) to control protein synthesis and mRNA degradation.
Area of Science:
- Virology
- Molecular Biology
- Immunology
Background:
- Coronaviruses, including SARS-CoV-2 and MERS-CoV, pose significant public health threats, necessitating the development of antiviral strategies.
- Understanding how these viruses evade host defenses and establish infection is crucial for therapeutic development.
- The conserved coronavirus nonstructural protein 1 (nsp1) plays a key role in modulating host cellular processes, including protein synthesis and mRNA stability.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the differential interactions of SARS-CoV-2 and MERS-CoV nsp1 proteins with the host integrated stress response (ISR) kinases.
- To elucidate the mechanisms by which nsp1 from these distinct coronaviruses affects host protein synthesis and mRNA degradation.
- To compare the impact of SARS-CoV-2 and MERS-CoV nsp1 on host cellular responses, specifically focusing on the ISR pathway and GADD34 expression.
Main Methods:
- Utilized recombinant SARS-CoV-2 and MERS-CoV expressing nsp1 mutants with alterations in conserved domains.
- Infected wildtype (WT) and knockout (KO) cell lines (PKR KO, PERK KO) to assess the role of specific ISR kinases.
- Employed single-molecule fluorescence in situ hybridization (smFISH) to analyze host mRNA degradation.
- Monitored host protein synthesis inhibition and GADD34 expression levels.
Main Results:
- SARS-CoV-2 nsp1 induced host protein synthesis shutoff via ISR activation (p-eIF2α), which was dependent on PERK kinase.
- MERS-CoV nsp1 infection did not lead to significant eIF2α phosphorylation, and translation was rescued in WT cells.
- Both SARS-CoV-2 and MERS-CoV nsp1 proteins were found to promote host mRNA degradation, a process dependent on functional nsp1.
- SARS-CoV-2 nsp1 suppressed GADD34 expression, while SARS-CoV-2 nsp1 mutants and MERS-CoV WT infection induced GADD34.
Conclusions:
- SARS-CoV-2 and MERS-CoV exhibit distinct strategies in manipulating the host ISR pathway via their nsp1 proteins.
- nsp1's role in inhibiting host protein synthesis differs significantly between SARS-CoV-2 and MERS-CoV, with SARS-CoV-2 heavily relying on PERK-mediated ISR activation.
- Both viruses' nsp1 proteins contribute to host mRNA degradation, highlighting a conserved mechanism of viral evasion.
- These findings provide critical insights into coronavirus pathogenesis and offer potential targets for antiviral therapies.
Related Concept Videos
Other Stress Responses in Bacteria
Regulation of the Unfolded Protein Response
Stringent Response in E. coli
Translational Regulation
The Unfolded Protein Response
Clinical Significance of Antibiotic Resistance

