Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 10, 2026

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques
Published on: December 9, 2022
Medical misinformation in Lebanese media: A qualitative study of Stakeholders' perspectives and policy gaps
Mohamad Sadek Zoghbi1, Adnan Fatfat1, Diala Jazra1
1Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Abstract:
The spread of medical misinformation through conventional and online communication poses a public health risk, especially in countries like Lebanon, where the healthcare system is fragile. Its dangers were highlighted during the COVID-19 pandemic and other health emergencies, showing how inaccurate or misleading information can alter public health behavior. Despite growing awareness about the problem, no study in Lebanon has explored health misinformation from the perspective of key healthcare stakeholders. The aim of this study was to investigate the views of key stakeholders on the causes and implications of health-related misinformation in Lebanese media, and to provide recommendations to combat it. We conducted a qualitative study using semi-structured, in-depth interviews with nine elite interviewees from the media, health sector, government, professional syndicates, and legal system. Interviews were conducted between March 17 and 25, 2025 and thematically analyzed using an inductive-deductive approach. Data saturation was reached at the eighth interview. Trustworthiness was ascertained through triangulated coding, reflexivity, and adherence to established qualitative rigor criteria. Factors contributing to the spread of health misinformation included low health literacy, poverty, political pressure on the media, and a lack of regulations on digital platforms. WhatsApp, Facebook, and Instagram were identified as major channels for rapid dissemination. Although some Lebanese media outlets practiced voluntary fact-checking and consulted experts, these efforts remained intermittent and unenforced. Government responses were described as reactive, relying more on public credibility than legislation. Existing health legislation was seen as outdated, weakly enforced, and disconnected from digital realities. The COVID-19 pandemic exposed these vulnerabilities and highlighted the need for coordinated broadcasting approach and stronger expert oversight across media platforms. Medical misinformation in Lebanon is driven by structural weaknesses across media, health, and legal systems. Addressing it requires coordinated institutional action, improved health literacy, stronger collaboration between media and health professionals, and updated regulations suited to the digital era.
Related Concept Videos
Health Literacy
Barriers to Effective Communication II
Cultural barriers:
Differences in values, beliefs, religion, knowledge, and tradition can significantly impact communication. Awareness of nonverbal cues is critical, especially when conversing with a patient from a different culture. What appears appropriate in one culture may be inappropriate in another.
Semantic barriers:
As a result of their tendency to use...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Nursing Ethical Principles II
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's...

