Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 10, 2026

Treatment Model for Young Patients with Psychogenic Erectile Dysfunction and Resultant Infertility
Published on: May 30, 2025
Provider-Engaged Development of a Sexual Dysfunction Screening Approach for Adolescents and Young Adult Childhood
Jenna Demedis1,2,3, Julia Reedy3, Eric J Chow4
1Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 13123 E. 16th Ave B115, Aurora, CO, 80045, United States, 1 720-777-0188.
Childhood cancer survivors often experience sexual dysfunction (SD). This study co-designed a screening intervention prototype with providers to improve recognition and treatment of SD in oncology settings.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Patient Care
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Sexual dysfunction (SD) affects 20-50% of childhood cancer survivors.
- National guidelines advocate for sexuality discussions during cancer care.
- SD is underrecognized and undertreated, impacting comprehensive care.
Purpose of the Study:
- To co-design a sexual dysfunction (SD) screening intervention prototype with provider partners for clinical oncology settings.
- To outline the co-design process as a case study, detailing challenges and strategies for consensus-driven intervention development.
- To create a prototype for improved SD screening and management in pediatric cancer care.
Main Methods:
- Engaged pediatric cancer providers in multiple co-design sessions at an NCI-designated cancer center.
- Utilized templates outlining considerations and decisions for intervention components.
- Facilitated consensus-driven decision-making on screening modality, workflow, and management.
- Conducted rapid qualitative analysis to synthesize findings and develop a menu of intervention options.
Main Results:
- Six providers from various oncology subspecialties participated in 5 co-design sessions.
- Consensus was reached on key intervention and implementation decisions, including target population, screening frequency, and modality.
- Interconnected decisions required iterative adjustments to ensure a cohesive prototype.
- Moderator strategies facilitated decision-making and alignment with patient and provider priorities.
Conclusions:
- Collaborative co-design with providers yielded a preliminary SD screening approach for adolescent and young adult cancer patients and survivors.
- The co-design process ensured intervention and implementation decisions reflected identified priorities.
- Future research will focus on testing, adapting, and refining the prototype before effectiveness trials and dissemination.
Related Concept Videos
Sex Linked Disorders
Psychosexual Theory of Development
The Five Stages of Psychosexual Development
Freud's psychosexual...
Nursing Assessment of the Genitourinary System I: Health History
Sexually Transmitted Infections
Nursing Assessment of the Genitourinary System II: Inspection and Palpation
Disorders of the Male Reproductive System
Prostate disorders are another major concern. These conditions can impair urinary flow due to the prostate's location around the urethra....

