Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 10, 2026

Integration of Wet and Dry Bench Processes Optimizes Targeted Next-generation Sequencing of Low-quality and Low-quantity Tumor Biopsies
Published on: April 11, 2016
Optimized precision oncology through implementation of a comprehensive molecular analysis pipeline - relevance for
Nuwar Harb1, Marcel Romey1, Albert Grass1
1Institute of Pathology, Philipps-University Marburg and University Hospital Marburg (UKGM), Marburg, Germany.
Background And Purpose:
Personalized medicine is guided by an expanding array of molecular targets. This study investigates whether larger next-generation sequencing (NGS) gene panels (> 1 Mb) yield more clinically relevant therapy options in molecular tumor boards (MTB) compared to smaller panels.
Patients And Methods:
We analyzed 281 consecutive patients using a 430-gene DNA panel (1.3 Mb) combined with a RNA-fusion panel and compared the findings to a 185-gene DNA panel (618 kb).
Results:
Molecular alterations were detected in 97.2 % of tumors with either oncogenic variants and/or gene fusions. Among these, 170 (60.5 %) received a molecular-stratified therapy recommendation from the local MTB. Only 8.8 % depended on the expanded 430-gene DNA panel, and additionally identified actionable variants in five additional genes. High TMB alone enabled 4.1 % of MTB recommendations.
Conclusion:
Our findings indicate that sufficient genomic coverage in DNA panels is essential for reliable TMB calculation, defining a minimal standard for genomic cancer care.
Insights
Larger next-generation sequencing (NGS) gene panels provide more clinically relevant therapy options for molecular tumor boards (MTB). Sufficient genomic coverage is essential for accurate tumor mutational burden (TMB) calculation in cancer care.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Genomics
- Personalized Medicine
Background:
- Personalized medicine relies on identifying molecular targets for tailored therapies.
- The efficacy of different next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel sizes in identifying these targets is under investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the clinical utility of larger NGS gene panels (> 1 Mb) versus smaller panels for identifying actionable molecular targets.
- To assess the impact of panel size on molecular tumor board (MTB) recommendations and therapy selection.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 281 patients' tumors using a 430-gene DNA panel (1.3 Mb) and a RNA-fusion panel.
- Comparison of results with a smaller 185-gene DNA panel (618 kb).
Main Results:
- Molecular alterations were detected in 97.2% of tumors.
- 170 patients (60.5%) received molecular-stratified therapy recommendations.
- The larger 430-gene panel identified actionable variants in five additional genes, crucial for 8.8% of recommendations. High tumor mutational burden (TMB) alone guided 4.1% of recommendations.
Conclusions:
- Sufficient genomic coverage via larger DNA panels is critical for reliable TMB calculation.
- Establishing minimum genomic coverage standards is essential for comprehensive cancer care.

