The Promise of Chemotherapy-Free Strategies in Advanced Driver-Negative NSCLC: A Systematic Review and Network
Zirui Li1, Weixing Zhao1, Wanjing Guo1
1Department of Oncology, Graduate School of Qinghai University, Xining, Qinghai, China.
Background:
Antiangiogenic combination therapy-antiangiogenic agents combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors and/or chemotherapy-has become an important treatment strategy for advanced driver-negative non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We conducted a network meta-analysis to compare efficacy and safety and identify optimal antiangiogenic combinations.
Methods:
We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated antiangiogenic combination therapies. Primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and incidence of grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs).
Results:
Nine treatment regimens comprising 5954 patients were included. The network meta-analysis indicated that the chemotherapy-free regimen of sintilimab + anlotinib achieved the greatest progression-free survival (PFS) benefit, compared with chemotherapy (HR = 0.39, 95% CI 0.23-0.67), and the lowest incidence of grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) (RR = 0.57, 95% CI 0.32-0.95). Recombinant human endostatin (Endostar) + chemotherapy provided the largest overall survival (OS) benefit vs. chemotherapy (HR = 0.46, 95% CI 0.36-0.58). The triplet regimen of atezolizumab, bevacizumab, and chemotherapy yielded the largest improvement in objective response rate (ORR) vs. bevacizumab + chemotherapy (OR = 1.90, 95% CI 1.40-2.60). Across most subgroup analyses, regimens combining immunotherapy, an antiangiogenic agent, and chemotherapy conferred the greatest PFS and OS benefits.
Conclusions:
This network meta-analysis demonstrates that antiangiogenic combinations improve outcomes in driver-negative advanced NSCLC. Endostar + chemotherapy offers the greatest OS benefit, atezolizumab-bevacizumab-chemotherapy improves ORR, and sintilimab-anlotinib provides superior PFS with lower toxicity. Treatment should be tailored based on clinical factors, with further validation in multiethnic trials.
Insights
For advanced driver-negative non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), antiangiogenic combinations improve outcomes. Sintilimab + anlotinib offers the best progression-free survival (PFS) with less toxicity, while Endostar + chemotherapy provides the greatest overall survival (OS) benefit.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Pharmacology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Antiangiogenic combination therapy is a key strategy for advanced driver-negative NSCLC.
- This includes combining antiangiogenic agents with immunotherapy and/or chemotherapy.
- Identifying optimal combinations is crucial for improving patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct a network meta-analysis comparing the efficacy and safety of various antiangiogenic combination therapies.
- To identify the optimal antiangiogenic combinations for treating advanced driver-negative NSCLC.
Main Methods:
- Searched major databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library) for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
- Included nine treatment regimens involving 5954 patients.
- Primary outcomes assessed were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs).
Main Results:
- Sintilimab + anlotinib showed the best PFS benefit and lowest grade ≥3 TRAEs.
- Endostar + chemotherapy demonstrated the greatest OS benefit.
- Atezolizumab + bevacizumab + chemotherapy combination yielded the highest ORR.
- Regimens combining immunotherapy, antiangiogenic agents, and chemotherapy generally offered the greatest PFS and OS benefits.
Conclusions:
- Antiangiogenic combinations significantly improve outcomes in driver-negative advanced NSCLC.
- Specific combinations like Endostar + chemotherapy (OS), atezolizumab-bevacizumab-chemotherapy (ORR), and sintilimab-anlotinib (PFS, safety) show distinct advantages.
- Treatment selection should be individualized, considering clinical factors and the need for multiethnic trial validation.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against specific...
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against specific...
Treatment Resistent Cancers


