Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 10, 2026

13:00
Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
Published on: January 23, 2017
10.4K
The Impact of Action Intention Versus Action-Effect Intention on Auditory Prediction Error Signals.
Andreas Widmann1, Betina-Christiana Korka2, Erich Schröger1
1Wilhelm Wundt Institute for Psychology, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
The European Journal of Neuroscience
|April 9, 2026
Summary
The brain predicts action outcomes, generating prediction errors (PE) when unexpected events occur. This study found early auditory N1 responses to prediction errors when participants focused on action effects, not just actions.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Cognitive Psychology
- Auditory Perception
Background:
- The human brain predicts sensory consequences of actions, generating prediction errors (PE) when outcomes deviate from expectations.
- Auditory event-related potentials (ERPs) are used to study neural markers of prediction error.
- Understanding how intention (action vs. action effect) influences PE processing is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate auditory ERP markers of prediction error (PE) based on action intention versus action-effect intention.
- To determine if focusing on the action or its sensory consequence modulates early PE processing.
- To explore the neural basis of action-effect binding and prediction violation.
Main Methods:
- Participants were divided into two groups: action intention (visual cues indicated button press) and action-effect intention (visual cues indicated tone pitch).
- Participants pressed buttons to produce tones, with occasional "incongruent sounds" where the expected tone did not occur.
- Auditory event-related potentials (ERPs), specifically N1, N2b, and P3 components, were recorded.
Main Results:
- Incongruent sounds elicited an enhanced auditory N1 component compared to congruent sounds only in the action-effect intention group.
- Later prediction error responses (N2b and P3 components) were observed in both groups, regardless of intention.
- This suggests early sensory prediction relies on effect-based intention, while later conceptual processing occurs in both.
Conclusions:
- Focusing on the intended action effect, rather than the action itself, leads to early sensory prediction and enhanced N1 response to prediction errors.
- Action-effect associations are represented and processed at a conceptual level, as evidenced by later ERP components in both groups.
- These findings support integrated models of event representation, incorporating stimuli, actions, and outcomes.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Actor-Observer Effect
518
The actor-observer effect, a cognitive bias closely linked to the fundamental attribution error, refers to the tendency for individuals to attribute their behavior to external, situational factors while explaining others’ behavior in terms of internal, dispositional traits. This asymmetry in attribution significantly influences social perception and judgment.Cognitive Mechanisms Behind the EffectTwo primary psychological mechanisms contribute to the actor-observer effect: differences in...
518
Hindsight Biases
4.5K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now?
4.5K
Fundamental Attribution Error
14.1K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
14.1K
Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory
917
Correspondent inference theory, proposed by Jones and Davis in 1965, seeks to explain how individuals infer stable personality traits from observed behaviors. It suggests that people attribute actions to underlying dispositions rather than external circumstances, particularly when the behavior appears intentional and socially significant.Voluntary Behavior and Dispositional AttributionAccording to this theory, individuals are more likely to attribute behavior to personal traits when it appears...
917

