Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 10, 2026

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
Published on: June 3, 2013
Going Beyond Beauty: Characterizing the Complexity of Aesthetic Experiences
Vicente Estrada Gonzalez1,2, Kohinoor Monish Darda1,3, Eileen R Cardillo1
1Penn Center for Neuroaesthetics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Traditional aesthetic judgments like beauty and liking show high agreement. However, complex aesthetic experiences, such as immersion and epistemic transformation, exhibit greater individual variability, regardless of viewing context.
Area of Science:
- Empirical aesthetics
- Cognitive psychology
- Art appraisal
Background:
- Aesthetic experiences traditionally assessed via beauty and liking judgments.
- Higher agreement exists for natural stimuli compared to artworks, highlighting subjectivity.
- Existing research lacks nuanced evaluation of aesthetic impact variability.
Purpose of the Study:
- Investigate agreement across diverse aesthetic impacts beyond global beauty and liking.
- Hypothesize that complex cognitive/emotional impacts are more variable than simple affective ones.
- Examine the influence of viewing context (in-person vs. digital) on aesthetic agreement.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a taxonomy of aesthetic impacts: positive affect, negative affect, immersion/motivation, and epistemic transformation.
- Employed the mean-minus-one method to measure individual agreement across impact categories.
- Compared agreement levels for artworks viewed in museum and digital contexts.
Main Results:
- Agreement was highest for liking and beauty judgments.
- Lower agreement observed for higher-order impacts, specifically immersion/motivation and epistemic transformation.
- Viewing context (in-person vs. digital) did not significantly alter agreement levels.
Conclusions:
- Traditional aesthetic evaluations (liking, beauty) demonstrate high inter-individual agreement.
- Complex aesthetic appraisals, including immersion and epistemic transformation, are more subjective and variable.
- Viewing context does not appear to be a significant factor in the variability of aesthetic evaluations.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Factors Affecting Perception
An illustrative example of a perceptual set is the scenario where an airline pilot told...
Structuralism
Titchener's approach to structuralism was unique. He...
Impression Management Techniques I: Managing Appearances
Gestalt Principles of Perception
Factors Influencing Attraction II: Physical Attraction
Factors Influencing Attraction VI: Personality Traits

