Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 11, 2026

In Situ Monitoring of the Accelerated Performance Degradation of Solar Cells and Modules: A Case Study for CuIn,GaSe2 Solar Cells
Published on: October 3, 2018
Advanced metric for evaluating the performance of photovoltaic module enhancement techniques using a lifespan, cost
Sakhr M Sultan1, C P Tso2, M Z Abdullah3
1Solar Energy Research Institute, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600, Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia. mas2007_eng@yahoo.com.
Abstract:
This study introduces and applies the [Formula: see text] (lifespan, power and cost effectiveness factor) metric as a novel framework for evaluating photovoltaic (PV) enhancement technologies, particularly cooling and reflective systems. The metric represents the normalized ratio between the total lifespan-weighted power improvements contributed jointly by the PV module and its enhancer-after accounting for their combined cost-and the baseline maximum power capability of the standalone PV module normalized by its individual cost. [Formula: see text] integrates key parameters including enhancer-induced power gain, operational lifespan, and cost alongside the performance characteristics of the PV module. A comprehensive sensitivity analysis was performed to examine how variations in these parameters influence the long-term effectiveness of different enhancement techniques. The results show that although higher power gains generally increase [Formula: see text], this improvement is strongly moderated by the enhancer's lifespan compatibility with the PV module and its associated cost. Enhancers with short service life or high manufacturing cost exhibited reduced long-term effectiveness, even when delivering substantial power improvements. In contrast, low-cost enhancers with moderate power contributions achieved high cost-effectiveness when their operational lifespan matched or approached that of the PV module. The analysis also demonstrates that increases in the PV module's rated power (PPV, max) decrease [Formula: see text] due to an enlarged denominator, while reductions in either PV or enhancer cost improve overall performance. To illustrate real-world applicability, a comparative case study of single and double reflectors was conducted. The single reflector achieved a higher [Formula: see text] value (32.08%) than the double reflector (28.95%), indicating superior cost- and lifespan-efficiency. These findings confirm that the [Formula: see text]metric offers a robust, transparent, and flexible framework for comparing PV enhancement technologies and can support researchers, manufacturers, and policymakers in optimizing performance and return on investment.
More Related Videos
14:01Making Record-efficiency SnS Solar Cells by Thermal Evaporation and Atomic Layer Deposition
Published on: May 22, 2015
09:00Indoor Experimental Assessment of the Efficiency and Irradiance Spot of the Achromatic Doublet on Glass ADG Fresnel Lens for Concentrating Photovoltaics
Published on: October 27, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Power Factor Correction
Power Factor
Maximum Power Flow and Line Loadability
Maximum Power Transfer
By substituting the entire circuit with...
Electrical Energy
P-N junction