Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 11, 2026

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
Published on: April 19, 2024
Applying a hypothetical strategy to the intercurrent event of non-adherence with the parametric g-formula: a post hoc
Shaun Hiu1,2, Nina Wilson1, Kevin Wilson3
1Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Background:
We conducted a post hoc secondary analysis of the MET-PREVENT randomised placebo-controlled trial to target an estimand that uses a hypothetical strategy on the intercurrent event of non-adherence.
Methods:
We viewed the targeting of this estimand that uses a hypothetical strategy to handle the intercurrent event of non-adherence as a type of causal mediation problem, where randomised treatment is a binary exposure, adherence is a binary mediator, there is an exposure-mediator interaction, and mediator-outcome confounders that are caused by the exposure (e.g. gastrointestinal symptoms) are present. We used the parametric g-formula to estimate the average controlled direct effect (CDE) of metformin (versus placebo) on 4-m walk speed, which is interpreted as the average treatment effect under the hypothetical scenario that all trial participants adhered to assigned treatment. Variables identified as confounders were informed by a literature review and discussions with an expert; assumptions about the causal structure were represented in a directed acyclic graph. We applied a probabilistic bias analysis (PBA) to understand the potential for bias assuming adherence had been misclassified; observed adherence based on returned tablet count may be an inaccurate version of "true adherence" based on actual consumption.
Results:
Our sample size was 70 trial participants (34 metformin, 36 placebo). Our estimate of the CDE was 0.072 m/s (percentile-based bootstrap 95% CI - 0.292, 0.445). Results from PBA indicated that the greater the extent of misclassification, the more the CDE may be estimated with bias and over-optimistic precision.
Conclusions:
Our study provided supporting information on metformin's potential role as a repurposed medication to improve physical performance in nondiabetic older adult patients with physical prefrailty/frailty and probable sarcopenia. Unlike the main trial results, our results do not rule out the possibility of either a meaningful benefit or meaningful harm of metformin, provided that full adherence can be assured. We highlighted the parametric g-formula as a useful method in trials to target estimands with a hypothetical strategy to handle treatment non-adherence.
Trial Registration:
ISRCTN ISRCTN29932357.
Related Concept Videos
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Study Design in Statistics
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...
Censoring Survival Data
Assumptions of Survival Analysis