Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 11, 2026

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
Published on: June 12, 2020
Efficacy of Centanafadine for Executive Functioning and Learning Problems in Children and Adolescents with
Timothy E Wilens1, Dorothee Oberdhan2, Na Jin2
1Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Objective:
The objective of these analyses was to evaluate the efficacy of centanafadine for treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) associated features of executive functioning and learning problems measured over 6 weeks in children and adolescents with ADHD.
Methods:
Two phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials were conducted in children and adolescents with a primary diagnosis of ADHD at sites in the United States and Canada. Data presented here are from the total population of children aged 6-12 years (NCT05428033) or adolescents aged 13-17 years (NCT05257265) who received high-dose centanafadine or placebo for 6 weeks. Secondary and other efficacy endpoints assessed change from baseline in the Conners 3-Parent Short Executive Functioning and Learning Problems Content Scale T-scores and the Conners 3-Self-report Short Learning Problems Content Scale T-scores, all analyzed using a mixed-effect model for repeated measures. Clinically meaningful within-patient change and findings from a caregiver and/or adolescent self-report exit survey are also presented.
Results:
Overall, 76.5% (367/480) of children (mean age 9.2 years, 41.7% female) and 80.8% (371/459) of adolescents (mean age 14.7 years, 40.7% female) completed their respective studies. There were clinically significant improvements with centanafadine treatment observed as early as Week 1 in the Conners 3-Parent Short Executive Functioning (T-score least squares mean change from baseline [standard error] to Week 6: children, -6.8 [1.1] vs. -11.3 [1.1], p = 0.0026 and adolescents, -8.1 [1.0] vs. -13.0 [1.0], p = 0.0003) and Learning Problems content scale T-scores when compared to placebo (children, -8.2 [1.0] vs. -2.8 [0.9], p < 0.0001 and adolescents, -8.0 [0.9] vs. -3.1 [0.9], p < 0.0001). Similar changes from baseline were observed by adolescent self-report (-6.1 [0.9] vs. -2.5 [0.9], p = 0.0023). Compared to placebo, there was a 50% and 88% greater chance of experiencing clinically meaningful within-patient change in executive functioning for children and adolescents, respectively, and a 79% and 81% chance for experiencing clinically meaningful within-patient change in learning problems, respectively. Exit survey data support findings from clinical outcome measures.
Conclusions:
In addition to its impact on the core symptoms of ADHD, centanafadine improved executive functioning, learning problems, and impact on daily tasks in children and adolescents with ADHD.
More Related Videos
10:02Event Related Potentials ERPs and other EEG Based Methods for Extracting Biomarkers of Brain Dysfunction: Examples from Pediatric Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder ADHD
Published on: March 12, 2020
13:09Using Brain Activation nir-HEG/Q-EEG and Execution Measures CPTs in a ADHD Assessment Protocol
Published on: April 1, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
Diagnostic Criteria and Symptoms
To diagnose ADHD, symptoms must manifest before age 12 and be evident across multiple settings....
Cognitive Enhancers: Cholinesterase Inhibitors and NMDA Receptor Antagonists
CNS Stimulants: Cocaine, Amphetamines and Cannabinoids
Information Processing Approach
Parkinson's Disease: Treatment
Parkinson's Disease is primarily a result of the loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta. The cornerstone of...
Antidepressant Drugs: Tricyclics, SSRIs, and SNRIs