Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

693
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
693
Errors In Hypothesis Tests01:14

Errors In Hypothesis Tests

6.4K
When performing a hypothesis test, there are four possible outcomes depending on the actual truth (or falseness) of the null hypothesis and the decision to reject or not.
6.4K
Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests01:19

Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests

8.9K
A goodness-of-fit test is conducted to determine whether the observed frequency values are statistically similar to the frequencies expected for the dataset. Suppose the expected frequencies for a dataset are equal such as when predicting the frequency of any number appearing when casting a die. In that case, the expected frequency is the ratio of the total number of observations (n)  to the number of categories (k).
8.9K
Bonferroni Test01:10

Bonferroni Test

3.6K
The Bonferroni test is a statistical test named after Carlo Emilio Bonferroni, an Italian mathematician best known for Bonferroni inequalities. This statistical test is a type of multiple comparison test to determine which means are different than the rest. Bonferroni test can minimize the Type 1 error by reducing the significance level alpha, which otherwise increases with sample pairs.
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...
3.6K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

16.2K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
16.2K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

948
948

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

X implies Y - Testing Hypotheses of Direction of Effect Using Configural Frequency Analysis.

Integrative psychological & behavioral science·2026
Same author

Moving From Statistical to Hypothesis-driven Outliers.

Integrative psychological & behavioral science·2025
Same author

Multigroup Comparisons with Configural Frequency Analysis.

Journal for person-oriented research·2025
Same author

The Individual as Moderator of Variable Relations - A Configural Approach.

Journal for person-oriented research·2024
Same author

Log-Linear and Configural Analysis of Intra-Individual Time Series under Consideration of Serial Dependence.

Integrative psychological & behavioral science·2024
Same author

Latent Variables Analysis in Person-Oriented Research.

Journal for person-oriented research·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 11, 2026

A Method for Investigating Age-related Differences in the Functional Connectivity of Cognitive Control Networks Associated with Dimensional Change Card Sort Performance
09:01

A Method for Investigating Age-related Differences in the Functional Connectivity of Cognitive Control Networks Associated with Dimensional Change Card Sort Performance

Published on: May 7, 2014

10.6K

Control of Type 1 and Type 2 Errors in Configural Frequency Analysis.

Stefan von Weber1, Alexander von Eye2

  • 1Universität Furtwangen, Germany.

Journal for Person-Oriented Research
|April 10, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Configural frequency analysis (CFA) variants were compared. Victor CFA offers more power with larger sample sizes, especially when phantom types distort probabilities, while standard CFA is better for smaller samples.

Keywords:
CFAConfigural Frequency AnalysisType I errorType II errorVictor CFAtype strength

More Related Videos

Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms
07:31

Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms

Published on: February 8, 2019

7.4K
Experimental Methods to Study Human Postural Control
08:12

Experimental Methods to Study Human Postural Control

Published on: September 11, 2019

10.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 11, 2026

A Method for Investigating Age-related Differences in the Functional Connectivity of Cognitive Control Networks Associated with Dimensional Change Card Sort Performance
09:01

A Method for Investigating Age-related Differences in the Functional Connectivity of Cognitive Control Networks Associated with Dimensional Change Card Sort Performance

Published on: May 7, 2014

10.6K
Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms
07:31

Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms

Published on: February 8, 2019

7.4K
Experimental Methods to Study Human Postural Control
08:12

Experimental Methods to Study Human Postural Control

Published on: September 11, 2019

10.2K

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Psychometrics

Background:

  • Configural frequency analysis (CFA) is a statistical method used to identify non-random patterns in data.
  • Standard CFA may be less accurate when phantom types or antitypes, originating from external populations, distort marginal probabilities.
  • Victor CFA offers an alternative approach to address these distortions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare standard CFA with combinatorial Victor CFA regarding Type I errors and statistical power.
  • To evaluate the suitability of Victor CFA for detecting phantom types and antitypes.
  • To introduce and assess the utility of "type strength" as a supplementary measure in CFA.

Main Methods:

  • Simulations were conducted to compare the performance of standard CFA and Victor CFA under various conditions.
  • The study examined Type I error rates and statistical power across different sample sizes.
  • Data examples were used to illustrate practical differences in analysis outcomes.

Main Results:

  • Standard CFA demonstrated higher power with smaller sample sizes.
  • Victor CFA exhibited greater power with increasing sample sizes, particularly when phantom types were present.
  • The introduction of "type strength" provides a complementary metric for interpreting CFA results.
  • The two CFA variants can lead to significantly different conclusions regarding data patterns.

Conclusions:

  • Victor CFA is particularly valuable when phantom types or antitypes are suspected, offering improved power with larger datasets.
  • Standard CFA remains a viable option for smaller sample sizes.
  • Victor CFA's applicability extends to more complex models beyond the basic main effect model.
  • The choice between standard and Victor CFA depends on sample size and the presence of suspected phantom types.