Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 17, 2026

ADSC-sheet Transplantation to Prevent Stricture after Extended Esophageal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
Published on: February 10, 2017
Long-term Outcomes of Esophageal Replacement in Children: A Multicenter Study by the Indian Association of Pediatric
M M Zameer1, Vikesh Agrawal2, Ramesh Babu Srinivasan3
1Department of Pediatric Surgery, Narayana Health, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Insights
Pediatric esophageal replacement in India, primarily for long-gap esophageal atresia, utilizes gastric conduits with acceptable outcomes. Anastomotic complications are common, influenced by patient factors and surgical route, highlighting the need for standardized care.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Surgery
- Gastrointestinal Surgery
- Reconstructive Surgery
Background:
- Esophageal replacement (ER) is a critical procedure for children unable to preserve their native esophagus, often due to long-gap esophageal atresia (EA) or corrosive strictures.
- Existing data from India on pediatric ER are limited, primarily consisting of single-center reports.
- This multicenter study addresses the need for a comprehensive analysis of national patterns and outcomes in pediatric ER.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze national patterns, surgical techniques, and outcomes of pediatric esophageal replacement in India.
- To evaluate early and late complications, mortality rates, and long-term quality of life following ER.
- To identify risk factors associated with anastomotic complications in pediatric ER.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective, multicenter observational study involving eight institutions affiliated with the Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons (IAPS).
- Included children under 18 years who underwent ER, analyzing demographics, indications, conduit types (gastric vs. colonic), surgical routes (posterior mediastinal vs. retrosternal), and anastomosis timing.
- Statistical analysis included Chi-square/Fisher's exact tests and penalized regression to assess risk factors for anastomotic complications.
Main Results:
- Ninety-nine children were analyzed; 89.9% underwent ER for EA. Gastric conduits were predominantly used (98.9%).
- Overall mortality was 4.04%. Early and late complications occurred in 30.3% and 25.3%, respectively, with anastomotic leak and stricture being most frequent (13.1% each).
- Risk factors for leak included higher weight, comorbidities, and retrosternal route; stricture risk was associated with comorbidities and retrosternal routing. Parental satisfaction and child quality of life were rated highly.
Conclusions:
- Pediatric ER in India, mainly for EA using gastric conduits, demonstrates acceptable mortality and satisfactory long-term quality of life.
- Anastomotic complications are prevalent and influenced by patient comorbidities and the chosen conduit route.
- Standardized approaches and continued multicenter collaboration are essential to further improve outcomes in pediatric esophageal replacement.
Introduction:
Esophageal replacement (ER) remains a challenging but essential reconstructive procedure in pediatric surgery when the native esophagus cannot be preserved, most often in long-gap esophageal atresia (EA) and corrosive strictures. Data from India are limited, with most reports representing single-center experiences. This multicenter study by the Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons (IAPS) aimed to analyze national patterns, outcomes, and long-term results of pediatric ER.
Materials And Methods:
A retrospective, multicenter observational study was conducted across eight IAPS-affiliated institutions. Children under 18 years who underwent ER were included. Data regarding demographics, indications, conduit type, surgical route, timing of cervical anastomosis, complications, and outcomes were analyzed. Statistical tests included Chi-square/Fisher's exact for group comparisons and penalized regression for exploratory assessment of risk factors for anastomotic complications.
Results:
Ninety-nine children (69 males, 30 females; mean age 22 months, mean weight 9.9 kg) were analyzed. EA was the indication in 89.9% and corrosive stricture in 10.1%. Gastric conduits were used in 98.9% - isoperistaltic gastric tube (48.5%), gastric transposition (GT) (24.2%), and reverse gastric tube (17.2%) - with only one colonic interposition. The posterior mediastinal route was used in 53 (53.5%) and the retrosternal in 46 (46.5%) children. Overall mortality was 4.04%, all in GT, with a mortality of 16.7% in transmediastinal GT in patients with EA, while nil in transmediastinal GT for corrosive injury, which were significantly bigger children. Early complications occurred in 30.3% and late in 25.3%, with anastomotic leak (13.1%) and stricture (13.1%) being the most common. Leak and stricture rates were higher after staged than primary anastomosis (19% vs. 8.8% and 19% vs. 7%, respectively; P > 0.05). Penalized regression suggested that leak was more likely with higher weight, major comorbidities, and retrosternal route, while stricture risk was greater with comorbidities and retrosternal routing. Mean parental satisfaction and child quality-of-life scores were 4.25 ± 0.94 and 4.03 ± 0.94, respectively.
Conclusion:
Pediatric esophageal replacement in India is most commonly performed for long-gap esophageal atresia using gastric conduits and is associated with acceptable mortality and satisfactory long-term quality of life. Anastomotic complications remain common and appear influenced by patient comorbidities and conduit route, emphasizing the need for standardized approaches and multicenter collaboration to improve outcomes.
Discussion:
Stomach-based conduits predominated in Indian practice due to their simplicity, vascular reliability, and adaptability to resource-limited settings. Retrosternal routing, though less anatomical, was often favored for its perceived safety and avoidance of mediastinal dissection. Leak and stricture rates were comparable to global data and appeared influenced more by comorbidities and conduit route than by staging or weight. The strong correlation between leak and later stricture underscores the importance of meticulous anastomotic technique and vigilant follow-up.
Related Concept Videos
Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
Clinical Manifestations:
Barrett Esophagus-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
To diagnose Barrett's esophagus, healthcare providers often recommend an endoscopy for those showing symptoms of acid reflux. The procedure entails...
Esophageal Strictures-I: Introduction
Etiology
The primary cause of esophageal strictures is long-standing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), accounting for about 70 to 80% of adult cases. Chronic acid reflux can lead to injury and scarring of the esophageal lining, culminating in...
Esophageal Strictures-II: Clinical Features and Management
Healthcare providers should gather a comprehensive medical history and conduct a physical examination for diagnosis. If esophageal stricture is...
Esophageal Varices-II: Clinical Features and Management
In the initial assessment, a thorough review of the patient's medical history is vital to identify risk factors such as liver disease, alcohol abuse, or...
Esophageal Achalasia

