Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Design Example: Frog Muscle Response

Design Example: Frog Muscle Response

A student is tasked to work on an intriguing experiment involving an RL (Resistor-Inductor) circuit to study the muscle response of a frog's leg to electrical stimulation. The RL circuit plays a crucial role in this experiment, providing the means to control and measure the electrical impulses that trigger muscle contraction.
When the switch connecting the RL circuit is closed, a brief muscle contraction is observed. This is because, at a steady state, the inductor acts like a short...

Tonicity in Animals

Tonicity in Animals

Tonicity describes the amount of solute in a solution. The measure of the tonicity of a solution, or the total amount of solutes dissolved in a specific amount of solution, is called its osmolarity. Three terms—hypotonic, isotonic, and hypertonic—are used to relate the osmolarity of a cell to the osmolarity of the extracellular fluid that contains the cells. In a hypotonic solution, such as tap water, the extracellular fluid has a lower concentration of solutes than the fluid inside...

Tonicity in Animals

Tonicity in Animals

The tonicity of a solution determines if a cell gains or loses water in that solution. The tonicity depends on the permeability of the cell membrane for different solutes and the concentration of nonpenetrating solutes in the solution within and outside of the cell. If a semipermeable membrane hinders the passage of some solutes but allows water to follow its concentration gradient, water moves from the side with low osmolarity (i.e., less solute) to the side with higher osmolarity (i.e.,...

Predator-Prey Interactions

Predator-Prey Interactions

Predators consume prey for energy. Predators that acquire prey and prey that avoid predation both increase their chances of survival and reproduction (i.e., fitness). Routine predator-prey interactions elicit mutual adaptations that improve predator offenses, such as claws, teeth, and speed, as well as prey defenses, including crypsis, aposematism, and mimicry. Thus, predator-prey interactions resemble an evolutionary arms race.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Behavioral Responses Buffer Seasonal Variation More Strongly than Endocrine and Chemical Responses in Poison Frogs.

Integrative and comparative biology·2026

Same author

Tartrazine Clears Live Cells while Preserving Viability at High Refractive Indices and Osmolality.

Bioconjugate chemistry·2026

Same author

Tartrazine clears live cells while preserving viability at high refractive indices and osmolality.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Same author

Non-lethal imaging and modeling approaches for estimating dry mass in aquatic larvae.

PloS one·2026

Same author

Insertion of an invading retrovirus regulates a novel color trait in swordtail fish.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025

Same author

Complete genome sequences of five aquatic <i>Janthinobacterium lividum</i> strains collected in Austria.

Microbiology resource announcements·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 11, 2026

Functional Analysis of the Larval Feeding Circuit in Drosophila

Functional Analysis of the Larval Feeding Circuit in Drosophila

Published on: November 19, 2013

Early diet programs feeding circuits and food solicitation behavior.

Marie-Therese Fischer, Camilo Rodriguez Lopez, Billie C Goolsby

Biorxiv : the Preprint Server for Biology

|April 10, 2026

Summary

Early nutrition quality, not just quantity, programs brain development and social behaviors in tadpoles. Diet quality shapes appetite-regulating circuits, influencing behaviors like food solicitation and feeding.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Exploring Retinal Regeneration Mechanisms in the Xenopus Frog

Author Spotlight: Exploring Retinal Regeneration Mechanisms in the Xenopus Frog

Published on: October 13, 2023

A Simple Behavioral Assay for Testing Visual Function in Xenopus laevis

A Simple Behavioral Assay for Testing Visual Function in Xenopus laevis

Published on: June 12, 2014

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 11, 2026

Functional Analysis of the Larval Feeding Circuit in Drosophila

Functional Analysis of the Larval Feeding Circuit in Drosophila

Published on: November 19, 2013

Author Spotlight: Exploring Retinal Regeneration Mechanisms in the Xenopus Frog

Author Spotlight: Exploring Retinal Regeneration Mechanisms in the Xenopus Frog

Published on: October 13, 2023

A Simple Behavioral Assay for Testing Visual Function in Xenopus laevis

A Simple Behavioral Assay for Testing Visual Function in Xenopus laevis

Published on: June 12, 2014

Area of Science:

Developmental biology
Neuroscience
Animal behavior

Background:

Offspring must balance energy needs with signaling costs for nutrition.
Early life nutrition's impact on appetite regulation and behavior is understudied.
Poison frog tadpoles offer a model for independent development and controlled dietary studies.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate how dietary quantity and quality influence growth, brain development, and social behavior in developing tadpoles.
To link early nutrition to the development of specific neural circuits and behaviors.
To understand the distinct roles of food quantity versus quality in ontogeny.

Main Methods:

Independent manipulation of dietary quantity and quality in poison frog tadpoles.
Assessment of body size, developmental rate, brain morphology, and social behaviors.
Analysis of specific neuron populations, including urocortin-1 (UCN1) and CART-expressing neurons.

Main Results:

Diet quantity increased body size; diet quality accelerated development.
Diet quality, not quantity, altered social food-solicitation behavior, increasing affiliation and reducing feeding.
Artificial diets led to reduced brain volume in specific regions and decreased anorexigenic neuron populations.
Urocortin-1 activity was linked to begging behavior and suppressed feeding.

Conclusions:

Dietary quality during development programs brain circuits essential for begging behavior.
Somatic growth is primarily determined by food quantity.
Nutritional quality shapes appetite-regulating neural circuits, influencing early-life social behaviors.