Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effect of crown-root ratio in endo-perio treated teeth restored with prosthodontic crowns.

Bioinformation·2026
Same author

Breakthrough in Antimicrobial Hydrogels for Dental Tissue Engineering: Regenerative Periodontics, Endodontics, and Pedodontics.

Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences·2026
Same author

Comparison between open and closed reduction techniques for mandibular fractures: A systematic review.

Bioinformation·2026
Same author

Potential use of liquid biopsy in diagnosing oral malignancies.

Bioinformation·2026
Same author

Patient Satisfaction and Acceptance with Dental Esthetics after Endodontic and Prosthodontic Treatment of Dental Dyschromia.

Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences·2026
Same author

Assessment of Prosthodontic Complications in Screw-Retained and Cement-Retained Crowns in Dental Implants: An Original Study.

Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 11, 2026

In situ Compressive Loading and Correlative Noninvasive Imaging of the Bone-periodontal Ligament-tooth Fibrous Joint
07:09

In situ Compressive Loading and Correlative Noninvasive Imaging of the Bone-periodontal Ligament-tooth Fibrous Joint

Published on: March 7, 2014

13.9K

Comparative evaluation of immediate versus delayed loading in dental implants.

Alisha Alam1, Satish Makwana2, Arun Kharavela Mohanty3

  • 1Department of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery, Jaipur Dental College, Rajasthan, India.

Bioinformation
|April 10, 2026
PubMed
Summary

Immediate dental implant loading, restored within 48 hours, shows similar long-term outcomes to delayed loading (8-16 weeks). Both protocols are reliable with proper case selection, though immediate loading offers higher early patient satisfaction.

Keywords:
Immediate loadingdelayed loadingdental implantsimplant survival ratemarginal bone loss

More Related Videos

An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage
11:51

An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage

Published on: February 10, 2014

16.0K
Effects of Mechanical Methods Used in Peri-implantitis Treatment on Implant Surface Decontamination and Roughness
06:36

Effects of Mechanical Methods Used in Peri-implantitis Treatment on Implant Surface Decontamination and Roughness

Published on: March 14, 2025

1.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 11, 2026

In situ Compressive Loading and Correlative Noninvasive Imaging of the Bone-periodontal Ligament-tooth Fibrous Joint
07:09

In situ Compressive Loading and Correlative Noninvasive Imaging of the Bone-periodontal Ligament-tooth Fibrous Joint

Published on: March 7, 2014

13.9K
An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage
11:51

An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage

Published on: February 10, 2014

16.0K
Effects of Mechanical Methods Used in Peri-implantitis Treatment on Implant Surface Decontamination and Roughness
06:36

Effects of Mechanical Methods Used in Peri-implantitis Treatment on Implant Surface Decontamination and Roughness

Published on: March 14, 2025

1.0K

Area of Science:

  • Dentistry
  • Biomaterials Science
  • Prosthodontics

Background:

  • The optimal timing for prosthetic loading of dental implants is debated.
  • Immediate loading (within 48 hours) versus delayed loading (8-16 weeks) protocols have different clinical implications.
  • Long-term outcomes and peri-implant health are key considerations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare peri-implant outcomes, marginal bone level changes, and survival rates of immediately versus delayed loaded dental implants over 24 months.
  • To evaluate implant stability quotient (ISQ), clinical parameters, complications, and patient satisfaction.
  • To determine the reliability of both loading protocols based on clinical and radiographic evidence.

Main Methods:

  • A 24-month comparative study involving 50 dental implants in 60 patients.
  • Two groups were established: immediate loading (n=25) and delayed loading (n=25).
  • Standardized surgical protocols were followed, with evaluations including implant survival, ISQ, clinical parameters, bone levels, complications, and patient satisfaction.

Main Results:

  • Immediate loading resulted in higher early patient satisfaction.
  • Both immediate and delayed loading protocols demonstrated comparable long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes over 24 months.
  • No significant differences were observed in implant survival rates or marginal bone level changes between the groups.

Conclusions:

  • Both immediate and delayed loading protocols for dental implants are reliable when appropriate case selection is employed.
  • While immediate loading offers enhanced early patient satisfaction, long-term results are similar to delayed loading.
  • The choice of loading protocol should be guided by careful patient and case assessment for optimal success.