Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 11, 2026
05:54
Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla
Published on: October 18, 2021
2.4K
Short dental implants versus sinus lift with longer implants
Trapti Jaiswal1, Radhika Tamloorker2, Prashant S Patil3
1Department of Prosthodontics, Crown and Bridge, Index Institute of Dental Sciences (IIDS), Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Bioinformation
|April 10, 2026
Summary
Short dental implants (less than 6 mm) offer a minimally invasive and reliable option for posterior atrophic maxilla rehabilitation. They show high survival rates, similar bone loss, fewer complications, and less treatment time compared to longer implants.
Area of Science:
- Dentistry
- Oral Surgery
- Implantology
Background:
- Treating posterior atrophic maxilla presents challenges due to low bone height.
- Sinus-lift surgeries are invasive, prompting interest in alternative solutions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare clinical outcomes of short dental implants (<6 mm) versus longer implants (>10 mm) with sinus augmentation.
- To evaluate the efficacy and reliability of short implants in posterior maxilla rehabilitation.
Main Methods:
- A comparative study involving 94 patients over 36 months.
- Clinical outcomes were assessed for short implants and longer implants with sinus augmentation.
Main Results:
- Short implants demonstrated a high survival rate of 96.6%.
- Longer implants had a survival rate of 95.5% with similar marginal bone loss.
- Short implants resulted in fewer complications and reduced treatment time.
Conclusions:
- Short dental implants are a valid and reliable option for minimally invasive maxilla rehabilitation.
- They offer comparable clinical efficiency with lowered morbidity and similar success rates to longer implants.
