Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 12, 2026

Vascularized Composite Upper Limb Allograft Harvesting for Proximal Arm Allotransplantation
Published on: June 13, 2025
Lung Transplantation in the Composite Allocation Score Era: Are Older Candidates Disadvantaged?
Shi Nan Feng1, Alice L Zhou1, Armaan F Akbar1
1Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Background:
We examined the impact of the Composite Allocation Score (CAS) on lung transplantation vs waitlist death/deterioration by age.
Methods:
We identified lung transplant candidates listed from 2020 to 2024 in the United Network for Organ Sharing database. Candidates were assigned to categories by age at listing (18-59 years, 60-69 years, and ≥70 years). Lung transplantation vs waitlist death/deterioration was compared across age groups before and after CAS implementation. Multivariable competing risk regression including a CAS interaction term evaluated whether CAS modified the association between age and waitlist outcomes. Separate competing risk models assessed whether age disparities exist after CAS implementation.
Results:
Of 12,082 candidates listed for lung transplant (median age, 62 years; 39.5%, 18-59 years; 47.0%, 60-69 years; 13.5%, ≥70 years), 8475 were listed in the pre-CAS era and 3607 in the post-CAS era. Compared with the pre-CAS era, the proportion of candidates ≥70 years in the post-CAS era increased from 13.3% to 14.0% (P = .04). In the post-CAS era, lung transplantation within 6 months increased for candidates 18 to 59 years (74.3% vs 79.1%; P = .98) and 60 to 69 years (79.6% vs 80.4%; P = .07) but decreased for candidates ≥70 years (84.8% vs 77.9%; P = .57). Waitlist death/deterioration within 6 months decreased for candidates <70 years but not for candidates ≥70 years (5.6% vs 4.2%; P = .24). Competing risk analyses revealed that in the pre-CAS era, older candidates had a higher likelihood of lung transplantation (60-69 years: subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR], 1.09 [95% CI, 1.03-1.16]; ≥70 years: SHR, 1.23 [95% CI, 1.11-1.36]). However, interaction analyses demonstrated less CAS-associated improvement for candidates 60 to 69 years old (SHR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.74-0.93; P = .002) and ≥70 years (SHR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.54-0.71; P < .001). In the post-CAS era, candidates ≥70 years old had a reduced likelihood of lung transplant (SHR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.69-0.90; P < .001) compared with candidates 18 to 59 years old.
Conclusions:
CAS implementation was associated with decreased lung transplant access for candidates ≥70 years old.
More Related Videos
12:49Porcine Liver Transplantation Without Veno-Venous Bypass As an Extended Criteria Donor Model
Published on: August 17, 2022
09:54Lung Rapid Recovery Procurement Combined with Abdominal Normothermic Regional Perfusion in Controlled Donation after Circulatory Death
Published on: August 15, 2022