Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 12, 2026

10:15
Utilizing Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Improve Language Function in Stroke Patients with Chronic Non-fluent Aphasia
Published on: July 2, 2013
18.5K
Predicting bilingual aphasia treatment outcomes using digital twins: a double-blind randomized controlled trial
Swathi Kiran1, Erin Carpenter2, Uli Grasemann3
1Department of Speech, Language & Hearing Sciences, Center for Brain Recovery, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA. kirans@bu.edu.
NPJ Digital Medicine
|April 10, 2026
Summary
The BiLex model may help choose the best language for bilingual aphasia therapy. Targeting the model-recommended language improved naming, while targeting the opposite language enhanced cross-language generalization.
Area of Science:
- Neurolinguistics
- Computational linguistics
- Speech-language pathology
Background:
- Bilingual aphasia rehabilitation presents challenges in selecting the optimal language for therapy to enhance recovery across both languages.
- The BiLex computational model offers a potential solution for predicting the best language for intervention.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of the BiLex computational model in predicting the optimal language for aphasia therapy in Spanish-English bilinguals.
- To compare treatment outcomes when therapy targets the BiLex-recommended language versus the non-recommended language.
Main Methods:
- A double-blind randomized controlled trial involving 48 Spanish-English bilinguals with chronic aphasia.
- Participants received 40 hours of semantic feature-based treatment in either the BiLex-recommended language or the opposite language.
- Outcomes measured included treated-language naming and cross-language generalization, with subgroup analyses based on performance.
Main Results:
- Both groups showed similar improvements in treated-language naming.
- The group receiving therapy in the model-opposite language demonstrated significantly greater cross-language generalization, albeit with higher variability.
- The BiLex-assigned group showed an advantage in most performance subgroups, aligning with model predictions.
Conclusions:
- The BiLex model's predictions were largely consistent with observed treatment outcomes.
- While targeting the recommended language aids naming, targeting the opposite language may promote broader cross-language generalization in bilingual aphasia.
- The BiLex model shows promise for guiding personalized language therapy choices in bilingual aphasia rehabilitation.
Related Concept Videos
Language and Cognition
997
Language serves as a bridge between ideas and communication, influencing how individuals perceive and interact with the world. Psychologists have long debated whether language shapes thought or vice versa. This discussion gained grip with Edward Sapir and Benjamin Lee Whorf in the 1940s, who proposed that language determines thought, a concept known as linguistic determinism. They suggested that the vocabulary and structure of a language influence how its speakers think and perceive reality.
997
Blind Procedures
13.9K
Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which...
13.9K
Blinding
4.1K
Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
4.1K

