Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 5, 2026
Integrated Field Lysimetry and Porewater Sampling for Evaluation of Chemical Mobility in Soils and Established Vegetation
Published on: July 4, 2014
Mixed-methods characterization of the tasks and factors influencing occupational exposure during biosolids land
Riley J L Demo1, Carsten Prasse1,2, Keeve E Nachman1,2,3,4
1Department of Environmental Health & Engineering, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Background:
Pathogenic and chemical contaminants in biosolids may pose risks to workers during land application. Characterizing biosolids applicators' exposures and risks requires information about the tasks and processes involved in the transportation, application, and use of biosolids, which is critically lacking.
Objective:
This mixed-methods study aims to characterize the tasks and processes that influence occupational exposure to biosolids during land application and generate preliminary task-specific exposure factors to refine exposure assessments for contaminants in biosolids.
Methods:
We conducted semi-structured, in-depth interviews with biosolids workers who apply, transport, and/or use biosolids in the United States and Canada. Following a framework approach to analysis, we identified the six tasks that constitute biosolids application and developed and administered a biosolids exposure questionnaire to collect preliminary data to derive exposure factors for use in occupational risk assessments.
Results:
Workers described frequent and direct contact with biosolids across six land application tasks: hauling, loading, spreading, post-application field work, cleaning, and maintenance. They mentioned instances of ingestion of biosolids, soil, dust, and aerosolized biosolids (spray), inhalation of dust, gases, odors, and aerosolized biosolids (spray), and dermal exposure to biosolids, soil, and dust. Cleaning and maintaining equipment and spreading biosolids were the most commonly reported tasks. Though workers reported spending the least amount of time cleaning and maintaining equipment, these tasks generally resulted in the greatest direct contact with biosolids.
Significance:
Workers' descriptions of direct contact with biosolids across all exposure routes indicate that land application represents a high-end exposure scenario that warrants further analysis. Our work fills a gap in understanding the behavior and exposure patterns of professional biosolids land applicators and presents preliminary data that can be used for deriving exposure factors for occupational receptors in biosolids risk assessments.
Impact Statement:
Exposure to contaminants in biosolids may result in undue health risks, particularly for workers who interact directly with biosolids when applying them to land as a soil amendment. Our mixed-methods exploration of land applicators' tasks, behaviors, and exposure patterns offers critical information for accurately assessing occupational exposure and identifying potential points of intervention.
