The Systematic Review as a Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) Project: A Curricular Innovation in One DNP Program

Area of Science:

• Nursing Education
• Evidence-Based Practice

Background:

• The Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) degree requires a scholarly project.
• Traditional DNP projects often involve primary data collection, which can be challenging.
• Systematic reviews offer a rigorous alternative for DNP projects.

Purpose of the Study:

• To advocate for the use of systematic reviews as a DNP project option.
• To demonstrate how systematic reviews align with DNP competencies.
• To present a model for integrating systematic reviews into DNP curricula.

Main Methods:

• Descriptive and conceptual analysis of existing literature.
• Historical context review.
• Case study of a three-semester curriculum for systematic reviews.
• Analysis of peer-reviewed research, professional guidelines, and faculty experience.

Main Results:

• Systematic reviews develop competencies in evidence synthesis, critical appraisal, knowledge translation, and project management.
• A scaffolded, three-semester approach enhances student engagement and skill development.
• Graduates are prepared to lead evidence-based practice change.

Conclusions:

• Systematic reviews are suitable DNP projects when combined with implementation and evaluation.
• This model provides an alternative to primary data collection, ensuring rigor and relevance.
• Adopting systematic reviews can reduce clinical site burden and expand project opportunities.