Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 11, 2026

06:30
Noninvasive, In-pen Approach Test for Laboratory-housed Pigs
Published on: June 5, 2019
9.0K
Motivation in cognitive tests and its outcome on test performance in pigs
C Galvagnon1, I Sanchez Garcia2, P Seddaiu1
1Institute of Genetics and Animal Biotechnology of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Department of Animal Behavior and Welfare, Postępu 36, 05-552, Jastrzębiec, Poland.
Animal : an International Journal of Animal Bioscience
|April 11, 2026
Summary
Pigs showed high motivation for cognitive tasks, increasing over time. While housing enrichment and lighter weight boosted motivation, it did not directly predict cognitive performance in pigs.
Area of Science:
- Animal Cognition
- Animal Behaviour
- Animal Welfare Science
Background:
- Animal motivation can influence cognitive test performance, potentially masking true abilities.
- Understanding the interplay between motivation and competence is crucial for accurate cognitive assessments.
- Environmental enrichment is known to affect animal behavior and may impact motivation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate pig motivation for cognitive tasks.
- To determine if pig motivation relates to their cognitive performance.
- To assess the impact of housing conditions (barren vs. enriched) and housing switches on pig motivation and cognitive performance.
Main Methods:
- 128 pigs (Sus scrofa domesticus) aged 9-17 weeks were housed in barren, enriched, or switched conditions (enriched-to-barren, barren-to-enriched).
- Motivation was assessed by measuring the time taken for pigs to voluntarily enter a test arena, using a motivation score (0-7) and duration.
- Cognitive performance was evaluated using a spatial 16-hole holeboard task, assessing acquisition, reversal, and long-term memory, with trial duration as a performance metric.
Main Results:
- Pigs generally exhibited high motivation, which increased with repeated testing (lower motivation scores and shorter durations).
- Enriched housing conditions positively influenced motivation during the reversal phase, with enriched pigs showing higher motivation and faster entry times.
- While motivation did not correlate with reference or working memory scores, higher motivation was associated with shorter cognitive task trial durations.
Conclusions:
- Pigs are highly motivated to engage in cognitive tasks, with motivation increasing over repeated exposures.
- Environmental enrichment and lighter body weight appear to enhance pig motivation for cognitive tasks.
- Despite influencing motivation, individual and environmental factors do not solely predict cognitive performance in pigs, suggesting a complex relationship between motivation and competence.

