Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 13, 2026

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
The Impact of Devolution on Local Health System Financing: A Synthetic Difference-in-Differences Study of Greater
Charlie Moss1, Philip Britteon1, Yiu-Shing Lau1
1Health Organisation, Policy and Economics (HOPE), Centre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Background:
Determining the effects of devolution policies through health system financing is pivotal in understanding their impact. Few existing studies have considered total health and care system expenditure, overlooking the transfer of resources through spending in different services locally. We evaluated the impact of devolution in Greater Manchester (GM), an area in England which received devolved health and social care powers from 2016, on the whole system of local public expenditures on health and care.
Methods:
Using data on public health and care spending for 149 local health systems between 2013 and 2020, we estimated synthetic difference-in-differences (DiD). We compared expenditure in total and by services for ten GM localities relative to a weighted combination of localities from the rest of England (excluding London) for four years post-devolution. We analysed expenditures in per capita terms and as a share of total expenditure. We investigated dynamic effects with an event study specification.
Results:
Compared with the synthetic control (SC) group, total annual expenditure on health and care increased in GM post-devolution by an average of £66.58 per-capita (95% CI: 11.85 to 121.30). Total expenditure on public health and social care, managed by Local Authorities, increased by £36.39 (95% CI: 6.99 to 65.80) and expenditure on social care specifically increased in the third and fourth years after devolution. We detected some short-term changes in expenditure managed by the National Health Service (NHS) Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs), including reduced expenditure on Continuing Healthcare and increased expenditure on acute healthcare and "other" miscellaneous expenditure. We did not detect a statistically significant effect for public health, primary care, community or mental healthcare.
Conclusion:
Results suggest that additional resources were used to respond to existing pressures on the health system, and that to redirect expenditure substantial increase in resources or re-organisation of services may be required alongside devolution of sufficient powers.
Related Concept Videos
Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System
Managed Care System:
The managed care system is designed to control the cost while maintaining the quality of care. The patient's care from admission to discharge is planned by the primary care provider or the case manager, also known as the gatekeeper. In a managed care system, the number of care providers is...
Secondary Healthcare System
Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:
Traditional Level Of Health Care System
The preventive healthcare service includes tests for screening. Preventive health care services include identifying and reducing disease risk...
Tertiary Healthcare System
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
