Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 13, 2026

Measuring Biophysical and Psychological Stress Levels Following Visitation to Three Locations with Differing Levels of Nature
Published on: June 19, 2019
Effects of Nature-based Group Intervention on Cognition and Nature Connectedness Among Lonely Older Adults Living in
Kaisu H Pitkala1, Ulla L Aalto2, Laura J Rautiainen3
1Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; Unit of Primary Health Care, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Objectives:
Nature experiences shared in peer groups according to the "Friends in Nature" (FiN) intervention in assisted living facilities (ALFs) reduced lonely participants' loneliness. Here we explored the effects of the FiN intervention of the H2020 RECETAS project on changes in the secondary outcomes of cognition, nature connectedness, and self-efficacy.
Design:
A randomized, controlled trial.
Setting And Participants:
Older adults suffering from loneliness and living in ALFs.
Methods:
Lonely, older adults from 22 ALFs in Helsinki, Finland, were randomized into (1) FiN group intervention once a week for 9 weeks (n = 162) or (2) usual care (n = 157). Participants were assessed at baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months. Outcomes were changes in cognition measured with the Clock Drawing Test (CDT) and Verbal Fluency (VF), nature connectedness assessed with Nature Connection Index (NCI), and self-efficacy assessed with the General Self-Efficacy Scale.
Results:
Mean age of participants was 83 years (73% women). Prevalences of frailty phenotype and dementia were 66% and 55%, respectively. At 3 months, the change in CDT in the intervention group was 0.11 (95% CI, -0.19 to 0.42) and in the control group -0.31 (95% CI, -0.61 to 0.00) (P = .047 between changes); the difference declined at 6 and 12 months. VF was not affected by the intervention. For NCI, change from baseline to 3 months was +1.7 points (95% CI, -2.5 to +5.9) in the intervention group and -4.3 points (95% CI, -8.6 to -0.07) in controls (P = .007 between changes). No differences emerged in changes of self-efficacy.
Conclusions And Implications:
Group intervention according to the FiN method improved participants' cognition and nature connectedness compared with controls. The nature-based group intervention can be implemented in ALFs by training professionals to be facilitators of the FiN method.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cognitive Development During Adulthood
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Group Therapy
Aging
Cellular Clock Theory
The cellular clock theory posits that the human lifespan is closely tied to the finite capacity of cells to divide, a phenomenon governed by telomeres, which are protective caps at the ends of...
The Effect of Aging on Tissues
Importance of Need for Affiliation

