Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 14, 2026
Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Gynecologic Cancer
Published on: April 17, 2012
Extended Follow-up from the Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for High-risk Localized Carcinoma of the Prostate (SHARP)
Luca F Valle1, Tahmineh Romero-Kalbasi2, Tommy Jiang3
1Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA; UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Background And Objective:
Most patients with high-risk localized prostate cancer (HRLPC) do not undergo stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in part because of the limited evidence of long-term outcomes. We report long-term efficacy and toxicity outcomes for men treated with SBRT for HRLPC.
Methods:
Individual patient data from ten prospective clinical studies evaluating SBRT for HRLPC across nine institutions were pooled in the Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for High-Risk Localized Carcinoma of the Prostate consortium. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate 5-yr biochemical recurrence (BCR) and distant metastasis (DM), stratified by receipt of intensified treatment (≥12 mo of androgen deprivation therapy [ADT] with extremely dose-escalated [≥8 Gy/fraction] prostate-directed SBRT). The impact of intensified treatment on BCR-free survival and DM-free survival was evaluated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. Late Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade ≥2 gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity was analyzed using time-to-event models.
Key Findings And Limitations:
In 440 patients with a median follow-up time of 60.4 mo, 5-yr BCR and DM rates were 22% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 17-26%] and 9.2% (95% CI = 6.2-12%), respectively. In the 93 patients (21%) who received intensified treatment, 5-yr BCR and DM rates were 7.4% (95% CI = 1.7-13%) and 3.7% (95% CI = 0-7.9%), respectively. Receipt of intensified therapy was associated with a significant reduction in both BCR (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.38 [95% CI = 0.20-0.74], p = 0.005) and DM (HR = 0.43 [95% CI = 0.18-0.99], p = 0.049). For the overall cohort, 5-yr rates of grade ≥2 GU and GI toxicity were 23% (95% CI = 19-27%) and 10% (95% CI = 7-13%), respectively. Limitations include heterogeneous treatment techniques and the nonrandomized nature of the study.
Conclusions And Clinical Implications:
The safety and efficacy profile of SBRT for HRLPC remains favorable at long-term follow-up, and SBRT should be integrated into shared decision-making for treatment of HRLPC.
