Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 14, 2026

A Microscopic Phenotypic Assay for the Quantification of Intracellular Mycobacteria Adapted for High-throughput/High-content Screening
Published on: January 17, 2014
Identifying mitochondria-related signatures for tuberculosis diagnosis through machine learning on single-cell
Xianyi Zhang1, Kehong Zhang2, Yu Wang3
1The Baoan People's Hospital of Shenzhen, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518000, China.
Abstract:
Tuberculosis (TB) remains a major cause of infectious disease mortality. Early diagnosis is crucial for curbing transmission and initiating timely treatment. However, the lack of reliable non-sputum-based diagnostic tools often delays prompt detection. Since mitochondrial dysregulation facilitates Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) evasion, we explored mitochondria-related gene signatures as diagnostic biomarkers. By integrating microarray (GSE19491) and single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq; SRP247583) data from active tuberculosis disease (TBD), latent tuberculosis infection (TBI), and healthy controls (HC) obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database, we identified ten mitochondria-related differentially expressed genes (MitoDEGs) -STAT2, CASP1, SCO2, PRELID1, COX7B, COX6A1, TSPO, IFI6, ATG3, and COX7A2- in the monocytic lineage. Enrichment analysis revealed that these ten MitoDEGs were primarily enriched in oxidative phosphorylation. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) validated the upregulation of these genes in an H37Rv-infected THP-1 cell model (P < 0.01). Using the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) and Support Vector Machine-Recursive Feature Elimination (SVM-RFE) algorithms, we prioritized three hub markers (STAT2, CASP1 and COX7B) to construct a blood-based diagnostic model. The SVM-based model achieved robust diagnostic performance in differentiating TBD in the training (n = 125; AUC = 0.852), validation (n = 30; AUC = 0.885), and two testing sets: GSE54992 (n = 15; AUC = 0.907) and GSE34608 (n = 26; AUC = 0.993). Moreover, an independent clinical cohort further confirmed its efficacy (n = 52; AUC = 0.909) in discriminating TBD from non-TB controls. In summary, we developed a three-MitoDEG model that shows promising diagnostic performance for TBD and was preliminarily validated, offering a scalable, non-sputum alternative for triage in resource-limited settings.
Related Concept Videos
Pulmonary Tuberculosis IV
Several diagnostic approaches are used to detect TB. The conventional method is the Tuberculin Skin Test (TST), also known as the Mantoux test. However, this method has...
Pulmonary Tuberculosis I
Causative Organism
The primary infectious agent causing tuberculosis is Mycobacterium tuberculosis, a slow-growing, acid-fast, aerobic rod that exhibits sensitivity to heat and ultraviolet light. Instances of Mycobacterium bovis and Mycobacterium avium contributing to the development of TB infection are rare.
Mode of...
Pulmonary Tuberculosis V
Latent tuberculosis infection occurs when TB bacteria are present in a person's body, but are not causing illness or symptoms. It is not contagious, and preventive treatment is crucial to avoid the...
Pulmonary Tuberculosis II
Here is a detailed explanation of its pathophysiology:
Transmission: The process begins when a person inhales droplet nuclei containing M. tuberculosis. These are typically released into the air when an individual with pulmonary or...

