Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 14, 2026

Author Spotlight: Advanced Ex Vivo Model for Investigating Cancer-Adipose Microenvironment Interaction
Published on: January 26, 2024
Ileocecal and Small Bowel Involvement Are Independently Associated with Inferior Survival Despite Complete
Ingo B Runnebaum1,2,3, Angela Kather4,5, Clara Evangelia Goerdt4
1Department of Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich- Schiller-University Jena, Jena, Germany. ingo.runnebaum@med.uni-jena.de.
Background:
Complete macroscopic tumor resection is the strongest prognostic factor in advanced epithelial tubo-ovarian and primary peritoneal cancer, yet benefit from maximum-effort cytoreductive surgery may vary with tumor distribution and site-specific resections. We aimed to identify predictors of long-term survival, considering postoperative morbidity, to inform preoperative stratification.
Patients And Methods:
This study had a retrospective single-center cohort of 302 all-comers patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics/American Joint Committee on Cancer (FIGO/AJCC) IIIC-IV epithelial tubo-ovarian or primary peritoneal cancer undergoing maximum-effort cytoreductive surgery in a European Society of Gynecological Oncology (ESGO)-certified high-volume tertiary referral center (2006-2021). Major complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ IIIb) were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression; progression-free and overall survival (PFS/OS) using Cox regression. Subgroup analyses explored site-specific bowel resections.
Results:
Complete resection was achieved in 259 (85.8%) patients, requiring high surgical complexity in 221 (73.2%, Surgical Complexity Score ≥ 8). Intestinal segment resections were performed in 71.5% of patients, including ileocecal resection in 24.5%. Large bowel resection (OR 2.708, p = 0.002) significantly increased major postoperative morbidity. Anastomotic leakage occurred in 6.0%, independent of transitory stoma formation (p = 0.759). Small bowel resection independently predicted impaired long-term survival (3-year OS 31.8% versus 57.0%, p < 0.001). Ileocecal resections were associated with poorest outcome (3-year OS 24.2%, p < 0.001). Complete macroscopic resection remained prognostically beneficial. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (13.9%) and high surgical complexity did not negatively affect long-term survival.
Conclusions:
Ileocecal and small bowel involvement are independently associated with inferior survival despite complete cytoreduction in FIGO IIIC-IV disease. These findings support preoperative triage and counseling by the multidisciplinary tumor board, with selective consideration of primary systemic therapy with planned interval cytoreduction for extensive small bowel/ileocecal disease, particularly in frail or complex patients.
Related Concept Videos
Histology of the Small Intestine
The intestinal lining features transverse folds called circular folds, each housing fingerlike projections known as intestinal villi. These villi are covered by a layer of simple columnar epithelium, also referred to as...
Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management
Here are some common surgical interventions for IBD:

