Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 14, 2026

Two-Dimensional X-Ray Angiography to Examine Fine Vascular Structure Using a Silicone Rubber Injection Compound
Published on: January 7, 2019
Fibroadipose Vascular Anomaly: A Distinct Vascular Malformation
Nitin J Inbaraj1, Madhavi Kandagaddala2, Shyamkumar N Keshava3
1Department of Vascular Surgery, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Introduction:
Fibroadipose vascular anomaly (FAVA) is a rare and complex vascular malformation. It primarily involves the venous components and is characterised by a matrix of fibrofatty tissue. This study aimed to describe the features of FAVA that differentiate it from venous malformation (VM).
Method:
A retrospective series of 62 patients diagnosed with FAVA from August 2019 to February 2022 at a tertiary care centre in South India was analysed. The diagnosis was confirmed by histopathology (n = 35) or characteristic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings (n = 27), reviewed by a multidisciplinary team. For the radiological analysis, 21 cases (with proven biopsy, in hospital MRI, and no prior intervention) of FAVA were selected; these were compared with 36 patients with slow flow peripheral VMs confirmed by MRI.
Results:
FAVA (43.5% males) and VM (55.6% males) presented at a mean age of 26.5 ± 13.1 and 23.7 ± 10.9 years, respectively. While both presented with swelling (93.7% and 94.4%, respectively), pain was significantly more prevalent among FAVA (87.1% vs. 52.8%). FAVA predominantly affected the lower limbs (79%), while VMs had a broader distribution. FAVA was misdiagnosed in 74% of cases, most commonly as VMs. On MRI, FAVAs more frequently demonstrated an intramuscular lesion (90.5% vs. 19.4%; p < .001) with fat proliferation (95.2% vs. 5.5%; p < .001) and fibrosis (90.5% vs. 2.7%; p < .001). FAVAs were also associated with periosteal reaction of bones (28.6% vs. 0%; p < .001) and neural encasement (14.3% vs. 2.7%; p = .26). Both FAVA and VM had vascular spaces (66.7% vs. 80.6%) in which VMs more frequently exhibited phleboliths (52.8% vs. 23.8%; p = .033) and fluid levels (33.9% vs. 0%; p < .001), while FAVA showed the presence of thrombus (61.9% vs. 22.2%; p = .003).
Conclusion:
FAVA is a clinically and radiologically distinct entity. Recognition of the characteristic MRI features of FAVA, particularly intramuscular fat and fibrosis, may aid in early diagnosis and guide appropriate multidisciplinary management.
More Related Videos
08:04In Vitro Three-Dimensional Sprouting Assay of Angiogenesis Using Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells for Vascular Disease Modeling and Drug Testing
Published on: May 11, 2021
09:53Whole-mount Immunohistochemical Analysis for Embryonic Limb Skin Vasculature: a Model System to Study Vascular Branching Morphogenesis in Embryo
Published on: May 20, 2011
Related Concept Videos
Pedigree Analysis
Vascular Spasm
Overview of the Vascular System
Anastomoses
Anastomoses can be formed at arterial, venous, and lymphatic vessels.
Arterial Anastomosis: These occur between arteries. They...
Seedless Vascular Plants
Type IV Collagen of Basal Lamina
A type IV collagen molecule has six alpha chains which can...