Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 14, 2026

07:45
The Use of Mixed Reality in Custom-Made Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A First Case Report
Published on: August 4, 2022
4.0K
Eliminating Nonvalue-Added Tasks in Health Care: Artificial Intelligence in the Orthopedic Office
Thomas Doss1, Jomar Aryee1, Diana Vitkovska1
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ.
Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online
|April 13, 2026
Summary
Generative artificial intelligence (AI) documentation prototypes can create usable orthopedic notes, saving physicians time. AI-assisted documentation shows potential for improved workflow efficiency, though human oversight is crucial.
Area of Science:
- Medical Informatics
- Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Clinical Documentation Improvement
Background:
- Physician burnout is a significant concern, partly due to administrative burdens like clinical documentation.
- Efficient and accurate documentation is essential for patient care and healthcare system operations.
- Generative artificial intelligence (AI) offers potential solutions for streamlining documentation processes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficiency and proof-of-concept of a generative AI documentation prototype in an orthopedic practice.
- To assess the usability of AI-generated clinical notes.
- To estimate the time advantage of AI-assisted documentation compared to traditional physician documentation.
Main Methods:
- A comparative study analyzed 68 new patient encounters, comparing AI-generated notes (using ChatGPT) with physician-generated notes.
- Documentation time, editing time for AI notes, visit complexity, and note quality were measured.
- Notes were generated from unedited audio recordings of encounters without identifiable patient information.
Main Results:
- Editing AI-generated documentation took a median of 55.1 seconds, versus 81.2 seconds for physician-generated documentation.
- 91% of AI-generated notes were rated 4 or 5 on a 5-point Likert scale for quality.
- Critical errors were found in 8.8% of AI-generated documents; physician documentation time varied with complexity, while AI documentation time showed minimal variation.
Conclusions:
- Generative AI can produce clinically usable notes across different encounter complexities.
- Physician editing of AI-generated documentation is faster than independent documentation.
- AI-assisted documentation holds significant potential for enhancing workflow efficiency in clinical settings, with human oversight remaining essential.

