Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 14, 2026

Thermochemical Studies of NiII and ZnII Ternary Complexes Using Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometry
Published on: June 8, 2022
Interaction energy decomposition methods: comparison and application to covalent interaction assessment
Edyta Dyguda-Kazimierowicz1, Paweł Kędzierski2, W Andrzej Sokalski2
1Institute of Advanced Materials, Department of Chemistry, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Wyb. Wyspiańskiego 27, Wrocław, 50-370, Poland. Edyta.Dyguda@pwr.edu.pl.
Context:
Since various interaction energy partitioning schemes yield different, basis-set-dependent components, we have analyzed several of them here using a wide range of even-tempered regularized basis sets reaching the Hartree-Fock limit. These results were subsequently compared with benchmark data generated by Symmetry-Adapted Perturbation Theory (SAPT). Our findings regarding the controversial polarization or charge-transfer term equivalents indicate that the delocalization term defined within Hybrid Variation-Perturbation Theory (HVPT) and the polarization term in Localized Molecular Orbital Energy Decomposition (LMOEDA) coincide with the corresponding SAPT terms, saturating rapidly as the basis set size increases. In contrast, other charge-transfer terms-specifically from the Kitaura-Morokuma scheme, from the Reduced Variational Space (RVS) method, and from the Absolutely Localized Molecular Orbitals (ALMO)-exhibit a much higher sensitivity to the basis set choice and tend to vanish in the large-basis-set limit. In addition, the ratio of the delocalization to electrostatic terms, , has been employed here to quantitatively analyze the potential covalent nature of the interactions within the active site of triosephosphate isomerase, aiming to evaluate the Zhang and Houk hypothesis, which attributes the catalytic power of extremely efficient enzymes to the covalent binding of the transition state.
Methods:
SAPT calculations were performed using the MOLPRO package, whereas the HVPT, RVS, Kitaura-Morokuma, and LMOEDA results were generated using GAMESS (US). The ALMO interaction energy components were obtained using the Q-Chem software. Exponents for the s-type even-tempered regularized basis sets were generated according to the Schmidt-Ruedenberg scheme.
Related Concept Videos
Van der Waals Interactions
Noncovalent Attractions in Biomolecules
Noncovalent Attractions in Biomolecules
Four types of noncovalent interactions are hydrogen bonds, van der Waals forces, ionic bonds, and hydrophobic interactions.
Hydrogen bonding results from the electrostatic attraction of a hydrogen atom covalently bonded to a strong-electronegative atom like oxygen,...
Bond Dissociation Energy and Activation Energy
MO Theory and Covalent Bonding
Molecular Geometry and Dipole Moments

