Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 12, 2026

Catheter Ablation in Combination With Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 26, 2013
Left atrial ablation using the dual-energy, lattice-tip catheter in the SAFE-Ablation Registry: How to avoid
Connor P Oates1, John Power1, William Whang1
1Mount Sinai Fuster Heart Hospital, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Background:
The dual-energy, lattice-tip catheter delivers either pulsed field ablation (PFA) or radiofrequency (RF) ablation (RFA) to treat atrial fibrillation. In both first-in-human and United States Food and Drug Administration pivotal trials, in which the catheter delivered both PFA and RFA, the system proved to be effective and safe-including no strokes. However, pivotal trials often do not reflect real-world clinical practice, such as the inclusion of patients with significant comorbidities and atrial scarring-factors that could promote procedure-related stroke.
Objective:
This study aimed to study the neurovascular safety of lattice-tip ablation of atrial arrhythmias in an unselected "real-world" population.
Methods:
The Stroke AFter LatticE-Tip Ablation (SAFE-Ablation) registry is a single-center retrospective registry of consecutive patients undergoing left atrial ablation using the lattice-tip catheter. There were 2 sequential timeframes: Period-1 (using "default" PFA and RFA power settings) and Period-2 (preferential left atrial PFA or decreased RFA [RFALA-Attenuated] settings: target temperature [68°C] and current limit [∼65%]).
Results:
Catheter ablation was performed in 507 patients-both de novo and redo-ablation (54.4%). During Period-1 (n = 294), 4 patients (1.4%) developed procedure-related stroke-all when using PFA+RFALA (n = 164) vs PFA-only (n = 130) (2.4% vs 0%, P = .073). During Period-2, 213 procedures were performed using PFA-only (n = 136) or PFA+RFALA-Attenuated (n = 77)-all without stroke. Combining cohorts, stroke was significantly more likely to occur in patients receiving PFA+RFALA using default RF settings compared with patients receiving PFA-only or PFA+RFALA-Attenuated (2.4% vs 0%; P = .004).
Conclusion:
During left-sided RFA with the lattice-tip catheter, use of the default settings is associated with procedure-related stroke. Ablation is safest when employing PFA-only or RFA using attenuated energy settings.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization

