Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 1, 2026

10:26
Inducing Apical Periodontitis in Mice
Published on: August 6, 2019
13.3K
Comparative Detection and Inter-Modality Agreement of Pulp Stones Using Digital Periapical Radiography and CBCT at
Hassan Hamed Kaabi1, Sarah Saeed Binhassan2, Sultan Hamad Alrumaih3
1Department of Oral Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, P.O. Box 60169, Riyadh 11545, Saudi Arabia.
Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)
|April 14, 2026
Summary
Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) detected pulp stones more often than digital periapical radiography (DPR) in extracted teeth. CBCT showed better agreement between its voxel sizes, especially in the radicular region, compared to CBCT and DPR.
Area of Science:
- Endodontics
- Dental Radiology
- Oral Pathology
Background:
- Pulp stones are calcifications in dental pulp, potentially complicating endodontic treatment.
- Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) shows promise for detecting pulp stones, but direct comparisons with digital periapical radiography (DPR) are limited.
- Understanding detection differences across imaging modalities and resolutions is crucial for clinical application.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare pulp stone detection rates between DPR and CBCT at different voxel sizes (0.1 mm and 0.2 mm).
- To evaluate inter-modality agreement for pulp stone identification using location-based analysis in extracted teeth.
Main Methods:
- Fifty-two extracted human teeth were imaged using DPR and CBCT (0.1 mm and 0.2 mm voxel sizes).
- Pulp stones were assessed in coronal and radicular regions using a binary scoring system.
- Detection rates and inter-modality agreement were statistically analyzed, stratified by location.
Main Results:
- CBCT at 0.1 mm yielded the highest detection rate (63.5%), followed by CBCT at 0.2 mm (57.7%) and DPR (50%).
- No statistically significant differences in detection rates were found among the modalities (p > 0.05).
- CBCT at 0.2 mm showed higher agreement with CBCT at 0.1 mm than DPR, particularly in the coronal region.
Conclusions:
- CBCT demonstrated numerically higher pulp stone detection rates than DPR under standardized ex vivo conditions.
- Location-based agreement analysis revealed greater consistency between CBCT voxel sizes than between CBCT and DPR, especially in the radicular region.
- Findings highlight modality and resolution differences in pulp stone detectability, aiding understanding of radiographic variability.
Keywords:
cone beam computed tomographydigital periapical radiographyextracted teethpulp calcificationpulp stonevoxel size
