Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 15, 2026

Measurement of the Hand Transmitted Vibration of the Human Hand Arm System During Operation of a Hand Tractor
Published on: June 16, 2021
Integrating Ergonomic Risk Assessment with the Hierarchy of Controls Among Informal Sewing Workers in Rural Thailand
Ratchanee Joomjee1,2, Monthicha Raksilp1, Niruwan Turnbull2,3
1Faculty of Public Health, Ubon Ratchathani Rajabhat University, Ubon Ratchathani 34190, Thailand.
Abstract:
Background: Informal sewing workers are widely exposed to ergonomic and workload-related risks but remain largely excluded from formal occupational health protection, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. This study evaluated integrated physical and mental workload risks associated with WMSDs among informal sewing workers to develop contextually feasible preventive guidelines based on the Hierarchy of Ergonomic Control. Methods: A mixed-methods study was conducted among 150 informal sewing workers in Ubon Ratchathani Province, Thailand. Quantitative data were collected using a structured questionnaire, the Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA), the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire (NMQ), and the NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX). Associations between sociodemographic characteristics, ergonomic risks, and WMSDs were analyzed using chi-square tests and correlation analysis. Qualitative data were obtained through a focus group discussion with key stakeholders to develop ergonomic control strategies guided by the HEC framework. Results: The majority of participants were female and middle-aged, with widespread exposure to high-risk ergonomic conditions, including prolonged sitting, repetitive tasks, and awkward postures. A high prevalence of WMSDs was observed, particularly in the neck, shoulders, and back. Younger workers and those with lower educational attainment experienced significantly higher ergonomic risk exposure and WMSD prevalence. NASA-TLX results indicated that physical demand and performance pressure were the main contributors to overall workload. Application of the HEC framework showed that elimination and substitution controls were the most effective strategies for reducing ergonomic risks, followed by engineering controls, while administrative measures and personal protective equipment were less effective. Conclusions: Informal sewing workers face substantial ergonomic and mental workload risks that contribute to a high burden of WMSDs. Prioritizing higher-order ergonomic controls, integrating workload management, and implementing community-based ergonomic interventions are essential to improving occupational health and reducing inequities among informal workers.
More Related Videos
09:33Visualizing Field Data Collection Procedures of Exposure and Biomarker Assessments for the Household Air Pollution Intervention Network Trial in India
Published on: December 23, 2022
09:30Author Spotlight: Microbial Control and Monitoring Strategies for Cleanroom Environments and Cellular Therapies
Published on: March 17, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Survey Safety
Standard Precaution
Hand hygiene is the most crucial means to prevent the transmission of disease. Employers are legally required to provide their workers with personal protective equipment (PPE) to minimize exposure or contact with...
Personal Protective Equipment
PPE Use in Healthcare Settings I: Donning
PPE Use in Healthcare Settings II: Doffing
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...