Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 15, 2026

Author Spotlight: Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Combined with Movement Observation in Cerebral Palsy
Published on: August 9, 2024
Effects of Telerehabilitation on Gross Motor Function in Children with Cerebral Palsy: A Systematic Review
Olga Maia1,2, Daniel Moreira Gonçalves3,4, Rui Vilarinho2,5
1Associação do Porto de Paralisia Cerebral (APPC), 4200-253 Porto, Portugal.
Abstract:
Background/Objectives: Telerehabilitation expands access to specialized neuropediatric physiotherapy for families facing barriers related to geography, work, or caregiving. This systematic review aimed to summarize the evidence regarding the effects of telerehabilitation on gross motor function (GMF) in children with cerebral palsy (CP). Methods: An electronic search was conducted in the following databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library; Google Scholar was consulted for additional literature. The search targeted randomized and non-randomized intervention studies evaluating the effects of telerehabilitation on GMF in children with CP at various levels of the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS), as well as related functional outcomes. The risk of bias in the included studies was assessed using the original Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool. The certainty of evidence was graded according to the GRADE framework. Results: Five studies involving 152 children were included, with CP aged 2.5 to 17 years. Telerehabilitation programs varied in duration, frequency, and type of intervention, as well as in caregiver involvement, comparator conditions, and outcome measures. The included studies suggested potential benefits in GMF and related functional outcomes; however, findings were heterogeneous, and superiority over comparison conditions was not consistently demonstrated. Conclusions: Although the reviewed studies suggest that telerehabilitation may be a feasible and potentially beneficial approach for children with CP, the limited number of studies and variability of interventions highlight the need for caution in interpreting these findings. Further high-quality studies with standardized outcome reporting are needed to clarify its contribution to GMF.
More Related Videos
04:49Author Spotlight: Enhancing Post-Stroke Upper Limb Rehabilitation with Robotic Technologies for Improved Motor Recovery and Functional Outcomes
Published on: September 6, 2024
05:52Mobile Game-based Virtual Reality Program for Upper Extremity Stroke Rehabilitation
Published on: March 8, 2018