Effect of a Guide-Suture-Assisted Modified Fascial Closure Technique on Postoperative Pain and Early Mobilization
Fatma Kılıç Hamzaoğlu1, Betül Dik2, Emine Türen Demir1
1Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Faculty of Medicine, Necmettin Erbakan University, 42080 Konya, Türkiye.
Background/Objections: One of the most common surgical procedures performed internationally is the cesarean section. It is known to be associated with intense postoperative pain and a slow recovery process. Focusing on surgical techniques, especially the type of fascial closure, is an area that has received very little attention when it comes to postoperative pain and rapid recovery. Using a mixed-methods approach, the primary objective of this study was to assess the impact of guide-suture-assisted modified fascial closure on postoperative pain and early mobilization after cesarean sections.
Background/Objections: One of the most common surgical procedures performed internationally is the cesarean section. It is known to be associated with intense postoperative pain and a slow recovery process. Focusing on surgical techniques, especially the type of fascial closure, is an area that has received very little attention when it comes to postoperative pain and rapid recovery. Using a mixed-methods approach, the primary objective of this study was to assess the impact of guide-suture-assisted modified fascial closure on postoperative pain and early mobilization after cesarean sections.
Methods:
Women undergoing elective cesarean sections with Pfannenstiel's incision were the study participants of this prospective, single-center, randomized mixed-methods study. Participants were enrolled in the study and randomized to either classical continuous fascial closure or guide-suture-assisted modified fascial closure, which was carried out in a 1:1 ratio. Quantitative data assessed postoperative pain through the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), and the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), and functional recovery was assessed through walking distances at postoperative 6, 12, 24, and 48 h. Qualitative data were collected via semi-structured interviews and analyzed through conventional content analysis to understand the patients' perceptions of pain and recovery experiences.
Results:
The first 24 h postoperative period pain levels were significantly lower for the modified fascial closure group versus the classical closure group (p < 0.05). Moreover, the modified closure group had a significantly better functional recovery, evidenced by walking greater distances at 12, 24, and 48 h postoperative. Qualitative results indicated improved comfort and stronger early mobilization confidence, in addition to less movement apprehension, consistent with the above results, among those with the modified technique.
Conclusions:
The modified fascial closure technique with guide suture was linked to less pain in the early postoperative period and better functional recovery after cesarean section. This technique is a good candidate for addition to standard obstetric procedures since it is cost effective, easily added, and surgical practice will improve comfort for mothers and assist with early mobilization.
