Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 15, 2026

A Coupled Experiment-finite Element Modeling Methodology for Assessing High Strain Rate Mechanical Response of Soft Biomaterials
Published on: May 18, 2015
The Effect of Variable-Pitch Headless Compression Screws and Cortical Screws on Interfragmentary Compression: An In
Brendan R Castellino1, Daniel J Wills2, Christopher J Tan1,3
1Sydney School of Veterinary Science, University of Sydney, Camperdown 2050, Australia.
Variable-pitch headless compression screws (VPHCSs) show potential for veterinary fracture repair. Deeper insertion of VPHCSs significantly increased compression forces compared to standard cortical lag screws (CLSs).
Area of Science:
- Veterinary Orthopaedics
- Biomechanical Engineering
- Surgical Implant Design
Background:
- Articular fractures require precise reduction and rigid fixation for optimal healing.
- Cortical lag screws (CLSs) are standard for lateral humeral condyle fractures in veterinary medicine, but have high complication rates.
- Variable-pitch headless compression screws (VPHCSs), common in human orthopaedics, are underutilized in veterinary applications.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the biomechanical performance of VPHCSs against CLSs in a simulated transverse fracture model.
- Specifically, to evaluate peak interfragmentary force (PIF) and area of compression (AOC) generated by each screw type at varying insertion depths.
Main Methods:
- A polyurethane foam model simulated a transverse fracture.
- 3.5 mm CLSs and 3.5 mm VPHCSs were tested.
- Pressure-sensitive film measured PIF and AOC between foam blocks.
- VPHCSs were inserted to depths of 2, 5, and 9 mm below the surface, while CLSs were inserted in lag fashion.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in PIF and AOC was found between CLSs and VPHCSs inserted to 2 mm depth.
- VPHCSs inserted to 5 mm and 9 mm depths generated significantly greater PIF compared to CLSs.
- Deeper VPHCS insertion (5 mm and 9 mm) resulted in significantly greater AOC than CLSs.
Conclusions:
- VPHCSs, particularly when inserted deeper, offer superior compression compared to CLSs in this simulated fracture model.
- These findings suggest VPHCSs may be a viable alternative for veterinary fracture fixation.
- Further research is needed to guide clinical application of VPHCSs in veterinary orthopaedics.
Related Concept Videos
Behavior of Concrete Under Compressive Load
As the concrete specimen fractures under...
Frictional Forces on Screws
A jack with a square-threaded screw is a mechanical device used to lift heavy loads by applying a force at its handle. When the force is applied, the screw turns, raising the load. The screw can...
Relation between Poisson's ratio, Modulus of Elasticity and Modulus of Rigidity
Impact Strength of Concrete
Dynamic Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete
The sonic test is a common method to determine the dynamic modulus. In this test, a concrete beam, sized either 6 x 6 x 30 inches or 4 x 4 x 20 inches, is clamped at its center. Vibrations are initiated at one end of the beam by an electromagnetic exciter unit powered by a...
